against the military or perhaps a disgruntled employee considering he had been in the navy? would those be your areas of initial thought? yes, john. you don t eliminate any reason why he did this. it could be as much timpl as workplace violence. you know, when we talk about doing background investigations, they do it when they are employed. what we are not doing is a proactive supervision of our employees. just like the incident where the psychologist had problems and nobody reported it. these problems that were created didn t just come on overnight. he didn t have a nightmare, wake up and decide to do this. somebody working with him, one of his friends or some place knew something like this could happen. that s a good point. there was a et seseattle report
employees. just like the incident where the psychologist had problems and nobody reported it. these problems that were created didn t just come on overnight. he didn t have a nightmare, wake up and decide to do this. somebody working with him, one of his friends or some place knew something like this could happen. that s a good point. there was a et seseattle report that suggested there were anger issues. there was an incident report from a neighbor he had about shooting into the ceiling and complaining intimidating this woman about noise issues. do you glean anything from that? absolutely. that s why the bureau does five-year reinvestigations. our employees are very good the backgrounds are complete. fbi employees are all