that the psychologist says is why the accused cannot remember everything that happened the night she says she slashed and shot her boyfriend. the defense team sought yesterday to try to help samuels clear up his testimony. listen. is it illegal to have intercourse with somebody without their consent? absolutely. all right. and with regard to this particular test that you were conducting with miss arias is it important to you what she thinks? that s most important. jon: let s talk about it with fred t icc e, former federal prosecutor. esther panich is a criminal defense attorney. you have not been impressed with what mr. samuels has been doing on behalf of the defendant here. impressed, the guy is a torpedo to the middle of their case. i told you last week that i thought the cross-examination of this case would be like doctor do you agree with me your opinion is based on jodi arias testimony about what happened.
i m not going to ask it, fred, but is it legal? is it league for a company to ask their employee for access to information like your height and weight and your glucose levels? is that legal? well, you know something? the answer to your question is, yes. met me say this. jenna, when i first heard about this, i completely popped off because this really, really bothered me. but when i started to look at it, i could spin this in this way. if all cvs is doing is saying to its employees, look, you have to take this test which is what they ve said you have to provide this information to your health people, to your doctor, and that s the end of it in an effort to get people to be cog any i santa of their blood cognizant of their blood glucose levels and work with their doctor and start that conversation, if that s all you re doing, then that s actually somewhat benign. but if you take the next step which is try to have your employees provide that information to their employer, i think
martinez the prosecutor went one step further and got the guy to admit on cross that jodi arias had lied to him which the jury has seen her do. as a result that of lie that the test was unreliable. i mean i can t it doesn t get much worse than that. jon: esther, you know the jury is going to have questions, we are going to hear those from them today. it s a little bit like being a fly on the wallin side the jury room, because you re going to find out later today what they think of his testimony to this point and what questions they still have. that s right. we are going to know exactly what they are thinking and whether they thought that dr. samuel s testimony as you reliable or not. i just want to disagree with thread for a little bit. dr. samuels was not brought in to justify self-defense. he was brought in for the limited purpose of explaining why jodi cannot remember what happened when she was stabbing him 27 times. it s not as important his testimony is not as important as
dan shore, esther panich. we will he continue to watch this. jenna: we have details on what can go in your bag at the airport. reporter: these are new rules and changes being proposed and already being criticized. the tsa announcing starting next month airline passengers will be allowed to bring small knives on board of their flights and able to bring souvenir, small baseball bats, golf clubs and whiffle ball bats. the bans have been in place since 9/11. box cutters, full blade knives and full size basketball bats are still banned. the flight attendant s union says it will fight the changes. union leaders say it will put flight attendants and passenger at risk and that the union will fight to keep the rules as they are. as for the small knives they have to be retractible blades no
jon: alicia acuna, thank you. arthel: for more on this let s bring in lis weill, fox news legal analyst and esther panich. good to see both of you. another thing that was said, arias said, travis alexander, the now deceased boyfriend being emotionally, physically, sexually abusive. weigh in on this bombshell. how does this affect the defense s position and prosecution s position and lis, i will start with you? the prosecution is still in very great shape. you said it exactly right. bombshell. this apparently happened. allegations apparently happened of conduct in january 2008. this is the first time we re hearing about it when the victim obviously is not around to twepd himself, not around to say anything else. all his friend, everybody supported him say there is no indication of that. forget about the friend for a second. forensics, dna. they went in. the police went in. searched his computer. searched his home. searched everything. no child important, nothing like that.