what he wants to talk about, and i think that case could very much be a lot. i do wonder, suzanne craig, weather, you know we talk about the specifics of this case and what may have been covered up. a lot of people think the case that the da s building around the sort of, not keeping the write books on the hush money payment, with the intent to commit campaign finance violations. the new york times floats this, your paper floats this improved, something to think about. i will read an expert. the public understanding of the theory of the case being assembled by alvin bragg and in particular, while underlying crime he may appoint to in order to transform new york law against bookkeeping fraud into a felony, that remains imprecise. it remains possible that brag has obtained non public evidence of some other intended offense like if there was any initial intention to deduct payments as a business expense on state tax returns. now without getting too wonky
for example, if you ar falsifying business records an furtherance of other crimes or to cover-up other, crimes or t facilitate other crimes. whether they are campaig finance crimes in violation of new york law, perhaps even i violation of federal law i there are attacks crimes attached to these hush money payments because there wer falsely taken on both federa and state tax returns as business expenses. i think it will be a much more robust indictment than just misdemeanor falsification of business records well, and how of thes public post by the forme president complicated what the da has to accomplish over th next couple of days if indee he is taking an indictment o thinks he is close he has effectively been dare by donald trump to show th goods. if you are working behind th scenes of the courthouse downtown, or the prosecutors office downtown in manhattan right now, how much more challenging is your job?
into a contract when wrae take some of your assets, tell me there s got to be something you could do about that. ththat seems so un-american. okay, the truth is chassagne that when they leave the statenh from state tax returns that jesse would add a one point five percent tax on californian%s who have global net worth of a billion dollars and a one percent tax on californians who make 50 million owhr more . and the proposal would make californians pay well, taxes, wealth ay wealth ta, taxes, even ifdo k they lose the state. you think that s constitutional? ? no, campi, i don t understand: o it. do you understan, i don td? i yeah. you don t understand money. i understand. you don t understand. i understand. u they have the law.nderwh they don t have the authority.eh le t yeah. okay, it s called a violation ie of interstate commerce. right. so yeah, if i , if i move out of california i can i stilll voe vote for californian politicians point can i commit crimes over there and then
Although the sudden wealth increase among millionaires can be attributed to establishing a wider market reach in different countries due to the constraints of