because what the justice department suit reflects, swes the individual cases, is sha we have a supremacy clause and that clause says in so many words the function of dealing with immigration is that of a federal nature, not a state nature. i m just going to say that i wonder if this now precludes the federal government or lawmakers from making a more concerted effort to change immigration. might we see this as a prelude to a much bigger effort forget immigration reform underway? oh, i totally agree. i think the legislators in arizona, at least those who are lawyers, have to really believe in their heart that the law is unconstitutional. i think the underlying plit motivation is to say to washington, look it, you haven t done your job. we re going to force you to do it. so, again, it is clearly political in that respect, but from a constitutional perspective, clearly unconstitutional. we have other cases we have