<div class='Quickread' id='DTElementID-4557414'> <p class='NormalParagraphStyle'>Desde el 2008 gobernantes y autoridades centroamericanas aseguraban su estadía y que se movilizaba por los departamentos de El Paraíso, Copán y el occidente de Honduras. </div>
possibly going to defend itself because the judge had really shut off every avenue of argumentation you could imagin fox news making. they were going to try to argu that they were reporting o newsworthy allegations by th president and his attorney the judge said he cannot d that did judge already rule that fo news aired defamator falsehoods the only thing we were arguing about was whether in airin those defamatory falsehoods, fox news raised to the standar of actual malice you heard the lawyer talkin about the repercussions. i think the point about th first amendment law is interesting. generally, from a lega standpoint, what is your tak away from the settlement look, you can quibble wit mr. that shackelford this wa in their self interest this was one of the very, if very rare cases in our socia history in which the publi interest -
you. you are there today. there s a lot of suspens during this pause. i don t think the announcement is shocking anyone how did they not do this sooner? what is your take away fro this announcement? in effect, they did settle i think it s not shocking but it is disappointing. there s been so much evidenc already unveiled through the course of this process about the utter cynicism and contemp with which fox news treated it audience and its journalisti responsibility there was a hope that a lo more would come out. to be honest, i was really curious about how fox wa possibly going to defend itself because the judge had really shut off every avenue of argumentation you could imagin fox news making. they were going to try to argu that they were reporting o newsworthy allegations by th president and his attorney the judge said he cannot d that did judge already rule that fo news aired defamator falsehoods the only thing we were arguing about was whether in airin those defamatory falsehoods
any sort of acceptable standar in any democracy, let alon american democracy what is your reaction t this report? what do you make of calls fo thomas to be held accountable? you, know this is a ver sticky situation even if there are no ethics rules for th supreme court justices but the influence, i believe that s what aoc is viewing aoc, it s democratic progressive who sits smack dab in the middle of a republica -controlled house, who nin times out of ten will not move on impeachment against clarenc thomas think about this, a billionair and his wife are taking a u.s. supreme court justice on luxur vacations, luxury that boggles the mind beyond our ow understanding. and then at the same time,
washington state case is reall critical to helping us hold th line, from this problemati decision from judge matthe kacsmaryk. in texas we know, at least for the next week, possibly longer, medication abortion, mifepristone specifically, i available. folks should understand that and they should be talking t their providers, their doctors about how they can access it it s really important to know, right, now it is legal and she had mifepristone be of the market, anytime in the nea future, my - the other medication abortio is still available look, we knew this judge, he s an extremist, you ve covered it we knew how he was gonna rule, even before he heard the arguments. he s an extremist. who s refused to use standar medical terms, and if you read the decision, it s outrageousl inflammatory it reads like something yo would read on a far-right blob not the writings of a judge. and this is a guy who has record of affiliation with the most radical organizations, an