Charge. The truth is in the history of this republic, theres never been a single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against a president like the one thats being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That, as weve said many times today, is actually quite common. And by the way, lets remember it needs to be noted again that President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight you are listening to one of the many hours of todays very Historic House Judiciary Committee hearing on the articles of impeachment against president donald trump. Our live continuing coverage will take place over this hour and further hours as needed. But we want to let you know how were going to cover this. Were keeping an eye on this hearing. We have reason to believe there could be a vote on the current amendment soon. The committees obviously been going full s
A single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against the president like the one being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That as we said many times today is actually quite common. By the way, lets remember, noted again, President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight and investigation responsibilities. I noticed the statistics this morning when we started, there were 25 Administration Officials that testified before the House Oversight this year and 25 at the House Judiciary Committee. At the start of the Impeachment Inquiry the white house produced more than 100,000 pages of documents to the oversight committee. In spite of their allegations, the democrats know President Trump has a lawful cause to challenge the subpoenas because they involve direct wln are
communications between high ranking advisors and a president. Thats ve
january 6th. what does that mean for the potential contempt of congress charges against giving no? and makes it even much more compelling. as does the text messages that we got from meadows that relate to navarro. so both of them are now pending it full vote in the house, and action hopefully by the department of justice. you can establish that they have relevant, and necessary essential testimony. they have knowledge that will help the american people, that will help congress to do its job, which is to find the holes in the laws, and to fill them. there are so many things that need to be made illegal, or where enforcement mechanisms need to be added, that donald trump has avoided accountability because of those gaps. and congress needs information to act on that. but in order to know who did all of the terrible things on january 6th, we need the full information, and we need
would we think that there would be an effort by the president to acknowledge and work in good faith to resolve said dispute. better in their minds to wait for the courts to resolve it, which is their right. president obama, during the fast and furious investigation, invoked executive privilege and barred essential testimony and documents. during its litigation, the obama administration argued the courts had no authority over its denial of such witnesses and evidence to congress. the federal court and committee on oversight and government reform versus holder disagreed. professor turley in his testimony testified he thinks the democrats impeachment process is an abuse of power. he said, quote, what i m saying is if you want a well-based, legitimate impeachment case to set this abbreviated schedule and demand documents and then impeach because they haven t been turned over when they go to