years chanting lock her up about hillary clinton because of some deleted emails or quote unquote wiping a surveyor, they re now out there defending a man who clearly did not take the national security of the united states to heart. i will be up to doj whether that reaches the level of indictment. but this is disgusting, in my mind. and a reaction to president biden s promise to cancel some student debt for low, middle income borrowers and to critics who say it doesn t go far enough. there are a lot of people hurting announce cider right now, people are getting crushed with inflation, crushed with gas prices, food prices and all the rest. i think a targeted approach right now really does send the wrong message, there s a lot of people out there making 30, 40 grand a year that didn t go to college. they need help as well. the criticism is correct, but the answer is not to deny help two people who cannot deal with these horrendous student debts. the answer is that, maybe j
agent of the potential damage resulting from donald trump s handling of the documents stored at mar-a-lago. now the intelligence community is pledging to get right to the bottom of it. and illiterate team by nbc news, the director of national intelligence errol haines, former chairs of the intelligence committee says that her office will lead an interview a well-of and documents at mar-a-lago. assessing the potential risks of national security. right now let s bring in nasa, former special agent the counterintelligence division of the fbi. also a senior lecturer at the yale jackson school of global affairs. and harry lippman, a former deputy assistant attorney general former u.s. attorney and host of the talking heads podcast. welcome to. both asha, you first. here what is your reaction to the decision by the intel community to first of all even conduct the damage assessment? why would be important? i m not surprised at all.