Matters before the board. Sherry kaiser is here, deputy City Attorney, representing the Environmental Health, and we will be joined by scott sanchez, and representing the Planning Commission and duffy representing the department of building inspection and joined i believe by representative from the department of Public Works Bureau of urban forestry. If you could go over the Board Meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. The board requests that you turn off all phones and pagers so that they will not disturb the proceedings and carry on the conversations in the hallway, the rules of presentation are as follows, each has seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttals. People affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the 7 or 3minute periods and members of the public who are not affiliated with the parties have up to three minutes each to address the board, but no rebuttals. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of minu
Not required. My left is robert brian and he is the deputy City Attorney who advises it is board and the boards legal assistant, and im the boards executive director, we will be joined this evening by representatives from the departments that have matters before the board. Sherry kaiser is here, deputy City Attorney, representing the Environmental Health, and we will be joined by scott sanchez, and representing the Planning Commission and duffy representing the department of building inspection and joined i believe by representative from the department of Public Works Bureau of urban forestry. If you could go over the Board Meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. The board requests that you turn off all phones and pagers so that they will not disturb the proceedings and carry on the conversations in the hallway, the rules of presentation are as follows, each has seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttals. People affiliated with these parties mus
And explicit but based on facts and circumstances the day with had the board upheld the prior decision the decision isnt a pure question of law but what is happening at the site and since there mr. Tail as wrapped up the ductwork in the light well as she requested and before that no mitigation measures taken. As i read the brief their initial installation b be less than 58 dp and from that point on never complied in my mind its not been actually come employed with the directions from the inspector. So. Talking about the 58 decimals in the light well. Im not sure by according to the briefs that came before me it had never the permit holder never got the d b down to 58 thats why mr. Tail had been in compliance since 2010. It specific question id like to ask the noise officer thats here to address it and okay. Thank you. Hi jonathan from the north control officer from the dph i can tell you that that was that equipment has always been in compliance based on the measurements ive seen from
Is the deputy City Attorney who advises it is board and the boards legal assistant, and im the boards executive director, we will be joined this evening by representatives from the departments that have matters before the board. Sherry kaiser is here, deputy City Attorney, representing the Environmental Health, and we will be joined by scott sanchez, and representing the Planning Commission and duffy representing the department of building inspection and joined i believe by representative from the department of Public Works Bureau of urban forestry. If you could go over the Board Meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. The board requests that you turn off all phones and pagers so that they will not disturb the proceedings and carry on the conversations in the hallway, the rules of presentation are as follows, each has seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttals. People affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the 7 or 3min
Wrapped up the ductwork in the light well as she requested and before that no mitigation measures taken. As i read the brief their initial installation b be less than 58 dp and from that point on never complied in my mind its not been actually come employed with the directions from the inspector. So. Talking about the 58 decimals in the light well. Im not sure by according to the briefs that came before me it had never the permit holder never got the d b down to 58 thats why mr. Tail had been in compliance since 2010. It specific question id like to ask the noise officer thats here to address it and okay. Thank you. Hi jonathan from the north control officer from the dph i can tell you that that was that equipment has always been in compliance based on the measurements ive seen from my predecessors with regards to the commercial industrial noise on that the 8 decimals over the ambient i dont know it thats in compliance on the rooftop because like ms. Kaiser said it was not assessable u