Submission and ruling on Tsatsu’s application
Former Attorney General, Marietta Brew Appiah-Oppong addressing the media after the sitting Pix by Eric Owiredu
Tsikata: My lords, I move in terms of the motion paper and the supporting affidavits. My lords, we filed the request on the 19th of January and, my lords, this is a situation by virtue of rule 5 of CI 16, we believe that this court is essentially adopting CI 47, and, therefore, in respect of CI 47, it is order 21 rule 9. As we indicated in our exhibit inspection 2, we filed a search, which indicates that there has been no response or whatsoever to the request that we made to the 1st Respondent. Now, my lords, there is no question that the 1st Respondent is the person with lawful custody of the documents of which we seek to inspect. And it is also quite clear that these documents are public records in the custody of the 1st Respondent. Your lordship will note that each of the categories of documents that we referred to in Par