Capitalism under attack. Others lotting walmart and others bank businesses. If i see any violence, i will remind folks that that dishonors what happened to trayvon martin. And now protestors are urging a boycott of florida. Johnathon, these businesses had nothing to do with this. Why is capitalism always under attack . It is frustrating, eric. The zimmerman case and occupy movie and nato protest. Just interested in destruction. The total destruction of values. Not like they want to take over and make money. Theyant to see the Business Owner lose that business. Theyant to so otherr people fail. And it is just the hatred of the good. And private businesses for being the good and calling them protestors is generous. They are vandals and these are riots and they should be treated as such. We have two liberals on the set. Wayne, hang in there. You are shaking your head. What did capitalism have to do with the murder trial. I missed your she and now i am onith johnathon. He is fine for a rig
And mike. Rich, scrap food stamps as we know it . We really do. We have to protect it for the people who need it. No one wants to see undernourished children or oer folks eing dog food. If we cover the cost of two and half Million People who are healthy and on food stamps and working age, we have an unsustainable program. We have disability claims rise by 7 million in obamas te nure. Nrick, when millions of people are getting welfare and deserve. It i am all for keeping a good eye on welfare. When we talk about food stamps. Schopercent of the people of people on food stamps have one person working and add into what is legimate and i take rich point. T everyone on disability should be. If you add that up. It goes up to 85 percent. You have to be so careful you are not so intent on cutting you cut people who need it. Many people here have it here. And every time we have welfare reform people attack. It in known 96 president clinton was attacked for suorting the republican reform. The lat
Our panel. Jayar jackson. I hope your unraveling theory isnt disastrous. Cenk i hope im wrong about it. On satellite, america how are you, my friend. Hey, cenk, good, and you . Cenk you look sharp man you look much sharper than us. I overdressed. Cenk pleasant your heart you look fantastic. Leading the ship, the Cara Santa Maria. That sounds like the captain of a ship. I get that. Early today we got our first glimpse of zorkar z r tsarnaev. Hes being indicted on 30 charges, including the death of two adults one child at the bombing and an mit police officer. He came to the federal courthouse today and submitted a plea of not guilty. Lets take a look. Supported by heavily armed guards tsarnaev arrived at the courthouse inside a white van. The accused boston bomber stood before a judge on wednesday slapped with a total of 30 charges. With his arm in a cast, he plead not guilty to all counts includes using a weapon of mass destruction. In attendance some of the victims from that horrific
Free, they wouldnt be worth it. Too often in modern times we gave up liberty under the false assumption that people in the federal government who are fallible can protect us. It is a risk to take. In a fro society there is risk but worth it to live with this. We should defend it. To johns point, what is weird, spying can be a Profit Center. Military and industrial complexes are inficient and will have corruption. It is not bean ball when we play with islac terrorism and the new information cold war with china and russia and not a war we can finish second in. I thi it is a murky area. John brings up a lot of points, but our liberties are dependent on our safety, too. Sabrina, what rich is saying, there is no bigger civil violation being murdered on the way to work in your commute. Let me lay it out to you. Local Law Enforcement have paid for wireps since 1994. Under the Clinton Administration th set aside a half billion bucks for it. And so the question is, what is the right way to go .
Free, they wouldnt be worth it. Too often in modern times we gave up liberty under the false assumption that people in the federal government who are fallible can protect us. It is a risk to take. In a fro society there is risk but worth it to live with this. We should defend it. To johns point, wat is weird, spying can be a Profit Center. Military and industrial complexes are inficient and will have corruption. It is not bean ball when we play with islamic terrorism and the new information cold war with china and russia and not a war we c finish second in. I think it is a murky area. John brings up a lot of points, but our liberties are dependent on our safety, o. Sabrina, what rich is saying, there is no bigger civil violation being murdered on the way to work in your commute. Let me lay it out to you. Local la enforcement have paid for wiretaps since 1994. Under the Clinton Administration they set aside a half billion bucks for it. And so the question is, what is the right way to go