Now in the hot seat, my god friend, andost of hanitty on fox news show. Well go with immigration and start with this first. Gang of eight, right. Eight senators say. Bad deal. Bad deal . Are you surprised georgeush weighed in on that . He tried hard t get it done when he was president himself. What is frustrating to me is a conservative. I will be willing and open to fixing the problem right now it is the law of the land. 1986 and 2006 we say secower the boarder and we dont secower the border. I watched it in the reagan years. We would have spending cuts and tax increases. You get the amnesty and legalization and you never get the border secure. If government is at a high level of distrust now, why they Department Listen to conservatives in the beginning. John, the idea of marco rubio and others and ram paul and ted cruz, secower the border. I am with them. How . How, use technology and hire more agents. E verify and make sure the people entered on a student visa that we track them and
Free, they wouldnt be worth it. Too often in modern times we gave up liberty under the false assumption that people in the federal government who are fallible can protect us. It is a risk to take. In a fro society there is risk but worth it to live with this. We should defend it. To johns point, what is weird, spying can be a Profit Center. Military and industrial complexes are inficient and will have corruption. It is not bean ball when we play with islac terrorism and the new information cold war with china and russia and not a war we can finish second in. I thi it is a murky area. John brings up a lot of points, but our liberties are dependent on our safety, too. Sabrina, what rich is saying, there is no bigger civil violation being murdered on the way to work in your commute. Let me lay it out to you. Local Law Enforcement have paid for wireps since 1994. Under the Clinton Administration th set aside a half billion bucks for it. And so the question is, what is the right way to go .
Free, they wouldnt be worth it. Too often in modern times we gave up liberty under the false assumption that people in the federal government who are fallible can protect us. It is a risk to take. In a fro society there is risk but worth it to live with this. We should defend it. To johns point, wat is weird, spying can be a Profit Center. Military and industrial complexes are inficient and will have corruption. It is not bean ball when we play with islamic terrorism and the new information cold war with china and russia and not a war we c finish second in. I think it is a murky area. John brings up a lot of points, but our liberties are dependent on our safety, o. Sabrina, what rich is saying, there is no bigger civil violation being murdered on the way to work in your commute. Let me lay it out to you. Local la enforcement have paid for wiretaps since 1994. Under the Clinton Administration they set aside a half billion bucks for it. And so the question is, what is the right way to go
Now in the hot seat, my god friendand host of hanitty on fox news show. Well go with immigration and start with this first. Gang of eight, right. Eight senators say. Bad deal. Bad deal . Are you surprised george bush weighed in on that . He tried hard to get it done when he was president himself. What is frustrating to me is a conservative. I will be willing and open to fixing the problem right now it is the law of the land. 1986 and 2006 we say secower the boarder and we dont secower the border. I watched it in the reagan years. We would have spending cuts and tax increases. You get the amnesty and legalization and you never get the border secure. If government at a high level of distrust now, why they Department Listen to conservatives in the beginning. John, the idea of marco rubio and others a ram paul and ted cruz, secower the border. I am with them. How . How, use technology and hire more agents. E verify and make sure the people entered on a student visa that we track th and mon
With steve, rick and john, and elizabeth and rich and sabrina. Emac, is the president right or wrong . No, he is wrong. He said at that time he had no patience with what was going on in the irs. He found it outrageous that the irs must be held accountable. And irs workers are saying this a task force in washington d. C. Basically oversaw the political targeting. The headf the irs trying to silence the opposition and didnt like the way the country was run. Rick, usually when you hear politicians saying it is phoney and fake, usually that means we have hit on something, no only when it is democrats. Yeah, look. The president is not suddenly saying that the irs targeting of conservatives didnt happen. As liz said he acknowledged it. But he is drawing a line to the white house exhibited by the daily caller when they pretended that the irs attorney went to a meeting, which he did in the white house two days before. What was the pretense. He was there and we have a picture. Take a look at th