trade in semiconductors because that is sensitive, but we do want the cheaply made manufactured goods that american consumers rely on. can they have both? ., american consumers rely on. can they have both? . ., . , american consumers rely on. can they have both? . . , ., , have both? there are always gains from trade have both? there are always gains from trade and have both? there are always gains from trade and it have both? there are always gains from trade and it is have both? there are always gains from trade and it is important i have both? there are always gains from trade and it is important to i from trade and it is important to find that middle ground where both countries stand to gain. it is not like the us is rolling out all exports and imports of things related to semiconductors, just at the very leading edge. nvidia and others are still selling plenty of chips into china and they will continue to do so. the equipment makers will also send equipment china. it is m
The partnership, which is expected to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles in the country, will help optimise the battery insurance and financing costs for the customers, Lohum said in a statement.
and so that s how both defence planners in beijing and washington view this issue. fairness, i don t think, is a criteria that either country is taking into account. and, linghao, if i can bring you in here, what are the main players saying about these types of controls? in general, the sentiment on the ground is that, you know, this is unfair, because if you re working in china s semiconductor industry, ithink, different people in the industry also will have a different view because for chip makers, they need those us equipment or the japanese equipment to make advanced chips. but when the equipment ban happened, it also created room for the local equipment makers to step into the market, because previously there s really no market condition for them.
but, when the equipment ban happened, it also created room for the local equipment makers to step into the market, because previously there s really no market condition for them. if you could get very advanced equipment from foreign countries, why would you take a chinese equipment that s less reliable and which is going to increase your production cost? so i think one of the knock on effects of this export control is that it actually incentivised china s local semiconductor industry to fix these weak points they have been working on for years, but they haven t seen any progress. is this an opportunity for chinese companies? well, for certain chinese
but when the equipment ban happened, it was to create room for the local equipment makers to step into the market because previously there s really no market condition for them. if you could get a very advanced equipment from foreign countries, why would you take a chinese equipment that s less reliable and which is going to increase your production cost? so i think one of the knock on effects of this export control is that it actually incentivises china s local semiconductor industry to fix these weak points they have been working on for years, but they haven t seen any progress. is this an opportunity for chinese companies? well, for certain chinese companies, it might be an opportunity. but for many others, it s, of course, an extraordinary headache because they have to find alternative sources of equipment, components that are, in many cases, not as good as what they were previously using. i think in aggregate, it s going to set the chinese