no matter how any american feels about global warming or man made global warming, every american should be very concerned when an executive agency exceeds their authority. and that s really what this case is about. it s about an administrative agency deciding there is a problem and addressing it without any bounds. the e.p.a. chose to try to implement broad protective statute by bending a little bit on the implementation side. i think that s a choice that the agencies have to be able to make. the supreme court hearing arguments, basically six cases in one, all dealing with regulatory powers of the administration. this one dealt with the e.p.a. and whether it could literally rewrite federal statute. so it would meet the e.p.a. s regulatory aims. rewriting what congress did. just a quick glimpse asking the slither general.