Bombs that were dropped by the u. S. Military during the vietnam war. Panelists include an environmentalist, a vietnam veteran, and several Staff Members from project for new, a vietnambased educational and bomber moving excavation bomb removing excavation. This was hosted in conjunction with the vietnam traveling exhibit. Hello. Interlude, an interlude that will remind us of 50 years ago in a very different way, but i want to first make two informational points. One is, you see that poster that is over there . What that is is imagining the wall if it represented all of vietnamese, lao, and cambodian that were killed. Our numbers were the different than the ones we heard today, but in any case, the white is there, that recognition of all of the deaths is a far more massive issue. I would like to introduce mary poster, if she will stand up. You will hear her at the white house tonight. Poignantlyer speak about her situation. Mary is from ball state university, where they organized the o
It as the potential to support more than 55,000 jobs in our state and contribute more than 53 billion in revenue. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment and at this time i would yield to the chairman. Mr. Calvert im not going to oppose your amendment. I certainly appreciate what youre trying to accomplish and generally agree that this administration has placed way too many restrictions on drilling both on shore and offshore. These restrictions have delayed the permitting process slowed Economic Growth in your state and many other states around the union, various groups have used that to their advantage, so i agree that more certainly certainty is needed in the leasing and permitting process. What im afraid of is that this might lead to a precedent for preempting the department of interiors Decision Making authority under any president and may lead to other amendments and kind of opening pandoras box of members doing specific amendments that are off their particular states. But
It would move more than 700,000 barrels of oil from canada to gulf coast refineries. But first, your reaction on this decision about the keystone xl pipeline. Here is how you can call in and give your thoughts. The numbers are on the screen. If you want to give your thoughts on our social media a couple of different writeups on this decision made by the white house yesterday this in the Washington Post this morning. Riding that the 90 day time frame for comments was supposed to end on may 7, but the state department extended that deadline, citing uncertainty created by a nebraska ruling that could lead to changes in the pipeline route. This story is also picked up in the pages of the wall street journal this morning. Amy harper and janet hook writing, adding this also, it gives reaction from canadian officials on this project as well. Here is a little bit of that. You see a map there, the red section of keystone that is already existing. The blue line that you see is the proposed route
Gina Falaschi Buchman is an environmental and litigation attorney at Babst Calland's DC office. Her practice focuses on environmental regulations under the Clean Air