Put the Foundation Next to the club and as you can see we dont have substantial excavation and our driveway is where it is today and as the previous building was located. We have changes from the club and i am going to have brad talk to you more about that. And so, this changes that we have done on this has resulted in the loss of about 500 square feet and two levels. And loss of two units and height, next to the club, and then, i want to talk to you more in depth. And in regards to that design aspect. My name is brad inaudible with the senior design staff. We prepared provision and we met with the planning staff and we met with them a couple of times to discuss the options and met with them in the ways for the design, it is a 6 story 58 foot high building on a lot, to the south and to the east on the courtyard and the building is organized by a 25 foot order and is organized on that edge, and on the overhead and you can see the revised eladministration that we have prepared against wh
Tv and prepare to take action today. And i did the same. Thank you, commissioners. And although i called the items up together and even though you had a hearing, and closed Public Comment because they appear on your calendar today. That does appear that the members of the public to speak to the item and i would encourage the members of the public to speak to the item only for new information and even though i called them up together i recommend that we take action separately. Okay. Good afternoon, president fong and commissioners Planning Department staff is joining me is joy, senior planner. And before you is an appeal of a preliminary negative declaration for the project that includes the 6th story mixed use building including 75 residential units and 970 square feet of retail use and 47 Parking Spaces after the july 18th hearing, commissioner sugaya raised the concerns about the vibration and the impacts on the Club Building which is a historic resource. And the concerns that you sh
[gavel] good afternoon, welcome to the board of supervisors meeting tuesday, september 10, 2013. Madam clerk, can you please call the roll . Yes, mr. President. Supervisor avalos . Avalos present. Supervisor breed . Breed present. Supervisor campos . Campos absent. Supervisor chiu . Here. Chiu present. Supervisor cohen . Cohen present. Supervisor farrell . Farrell present. Supervisor kim . Kim present. Supervisor mar . Mar present. Supervisor tang . Tang present. Supervisor wiener . Wiener absent. Supervisor yee . Yee present. Supervisor campos . Campos present. Mr. President , you have a quorum. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, could you please join us in the pledge of allegiance . I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic for which it stands; one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Madam clerk, any communications . I have no communications, mr. President. And could you read our 2 00 p. M. Special order . The firs
Am allow in person attendance approximate Public Comment providing Remote Access via phone. Will take Public Comment by each item in person will be allowed to speak first then to the remote phone line. For those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99 and sfgov. Org the call in number is streaming. The number is 4156550001. Upon eshd meeting id 2485 132 7480 when connected you hear the discussions but in listening mode only. When your item come up and Public Comment is called those in person line up near the curtains and those on the phone line should dial star 3 to be added to the queue f. You are on your phone remember to turn down your television and listening device. As already indicated. Will take Public Comment attends nothing person first and then we move on to our remote call in line. You may submit comment in the following ways e mail myself erica. Major sfgov. Org if testimony be forwarded not supervisors and made part of the official file byus postal to city hall 1 doctor carlton
Residential units and 970 square feet of retail use and 47 Parking Spaces after the july 18th hearing, commissioner sugaya raised the concerns about the vibration and the impacts on the Club Building which is a historic resource. And the concerns that you should have before you, and dated august first and the email from the Environmental Review dated august 5th. And the tech report from the project sponsor. And the report offered several possible methods of and the vibration could be avoid. Construction is a common situation . San francisco. And the codes and regulations adequately address the situation and there is no evidence that the construction of the project would materially impair the adjacent building, the proposed project lies on the Impact Analysis of the eastern neighbors eir and does not identify the damage to the Historic Resources of the significant had arranging anything and we looked at the building, and one thing that, one diagram that i would like to show you if i may