at the end of the world. state legislature. olivia has to work with. this is her home state. the original amendment adding those three verses from the book of genesis, that amendment did get pulled out of the bill on a procedural technicality. the senator who wanted the language didn t give up. he revised his language. the colombian mammoth created on the sixth day with beasts of the field is designated as official state fossil of south carolina. and must officially be referred to as the columbian mammoth which was created on the sixth day with the beasts of the field. that s what passed the south carolina senate. this science interested third grader wanted her state to have a fossil. found up with legislatures trying to enshrine, the wooly mammoth wiz created by god on the sixth day of the week. along with the beasts of the field.
effective contraception. the harm there and kennedy raised this in the articlement, the harm is women who work in hobby lobby have different access to health care because of their bosses beliefs. yes, the restoration act was crafted so individuals could opt out of things that violated their beliefs, but i don t think it was intended to kind of enshrine harm to other people. what do you think about that idea, bishop. take the corporation aspect aside. the individual aspect, the bill in arizona that governor brewer vetoed saying individuals could refuse services based on their individual religious beliefs. what do you think of that, the idea that individuals should be able to sort of opt out? provide a service or something. is that what is your take on that? those of us in the gay, bisexual and transgender know
frankly, it s a good deal for both sides. bill wants to fight about obamacare. it finally allows us to get back to regular order, right? so that we won t have government shutdowns. it does enshrine, really, the stupid cuts that were in the sequester. it was a doomsday device that sadly came into being. he want they want to get into national security. my question is, what deal would you take? what deal would the right take? that s a decent question. i asked paul ryan about the deal last week. and here s what he had to say. we re basically passing an agreement that we can pass that we can agree to. there are a lot of things not in the agreement that people wanted in the agreement. that s just the way it works. democrats control the senate,
so that we won t have government shutdowns. it does enshrine, really, the stupid cuts that were in the sequester. it was a doomsday device that sadly came into being. they want to get into national security. my question is, what deal would you take? what deal would the right take? that s a decent question. i asked paul ryan about the deal last week. and here s what he had to say. we re basically passing an agreement that we can pass that we can agree to. there are a lot of things not in the agreement that people wanted in the agreement. that s just the way it works. democrats control the senate, democrats control the white house. something needs to pass to fund the government. this is paul ryan s argument. and it s a lot easier to say no and be a purity republican. how do you respond to that?
he hasn t just faced this state. he s faced this complete expose of the state at the same time. it s put him in a politically impossible position. you look what he s done pushing for defense cuts. you would say anathema for democrat or for republicans to support some of those. that s come with no political consequences. what s difficult for obama, he agrees with a very large percentage of these policies which he wants to legitimate and continue an enshrine. i think it s hard for him to publicly make the case for legislation that would curb some of these excesses. ezra. i think it s interesting in underlying politics. one, we re having huge defense cuts right now. one of the great political misjudgments in the last few years was believing it s the old party with defense spending.