cataclysmic for the corporation. think about arthur anderson in 2001 when it was charged as part of the enron scandal. dan is right. there is risk if you charge the corporation. perhaps banks call loans. perhaps they don t extend further credit. i don t know what each individual bank will do, but there is absolutely a risk. so when prosecutors think about charging corporations they think about the collateral consequences the corporation, understanding that our actions in charging that company could put them out of business. dan is a very smart guy. we would be wise to listen to what he has to stay. staying late for extra credit, chuck, thank you for sticking around. coming up, the g.o.p. had all of today to condemn a fox news anchor who called the chairman of the joint chiefs a pig and stupid. so far, at least, just silence.
problems will be as soon as there is an indictment. they re likely to come a little further down the road. his immediate problems are more likely to be with any licenses that, particularly liquor licenses. in new york, he has one at trump tower. he s got liquor licenses at his west chester golf course, for example. things like that, those could be very troublesome for him. but in the long run, i don t know how he is going to refinance these properties that are underwater. is it unusual, glenn, to indict a company? you know, yeah. the the department of justice doesn t do it every day. state prosecutors offices don t do it every day. but, you know, there certainly is precedent, including some high-profile precedent. if you remember the enron scandal in the early 2000s, the arthur anderson accounting firm was indicted for obstructing justice. the firm was convicted. and that resulted in the firm folding and that seems like it could be, you know, the the trump organization could s
Repeated Covid-19 testing is going to be a part of public life for the foreseeable future. The current regulatory arrangement creates the opportunity for industrial-grade fraud.
trace gallagher, trace, getting bigger by the hour, almost. it is, sean, at the university of southern california any student with ties to the college admission scandal is now really an education in limbo. remember that usc already said students in question would have their cases reviewed, but the university has gone a step further by placing the hold on the accounts of the students which prevents them from registering for classes and getting their transcripts. and when the reviews are finally completed, the students could be expelled. and now actress lauren laughlin and massa moji annually who paid $500,000 to cheat their daughters into usc have high profile attorney sean berkowitz helping them, prosecuting wealthy ceos during the enron scandal in 2006 telling them during the trial that they would not be able to buy their way out of this one, and saying after their convictions, no matter how rich and powerful you are, you have to play by the rules.