ants and on human nature. he was a great writer. was a great writer. he was a fine writer. was a great writer. he was a fine writer, not was a great writer. he was a fine writer, not typically - was a great writer. he was a fine writer, not typically for| fine writer, not typically for academics who tend to be awful writers. he also thought big, he wrote a book called conciliar hunts, based on the enlightenment idea, that divisions between disciplines like chemistry and biology, but also the natural sciences, the social sciences and the humanities, were arbitrary. but it was a continuous landscape of knowledge, that the product of knowledge, that the product of human nature are what we call the arts and society, so there is no place where natural science ends and the human fields of study, like the humanities, the arts and the social sciences, humanities, the arts and the socialsciences, begin. 0n humanities, the arts and the socialsciences, begin. on top of that, he wrote a book
happiness that to secure that s rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the gofrmged. yes, ryan was cribbing from our third president, thomas jefferson and our greatest achievements, the deck calculation of independence. thomas jefferson is one of my favorite presidents, but paul ryan, you are not one of my favorite presidents. it was an enlightenment idea, bigger than himself. at the time that he first drafted the deck calculation of independence, we had not yet become as john adams famously said a government of laws and not men. whatever rights our young nation could lay claim to were delineated by one man, king george iii. but the brilliance of the words of thomas jefferson lies in the words of adverse alt. no one man is in source of those rights. they are endowed by one creator.