The nofly list you should have a right to be heard or have redress to challenges to be on that list. Some like security makes sense. Others might not. But the larger component is there is adequate control and accountability. So everything such as the individualized noticed, it is not feasible. There is the Greater Transparency also. Not the individuals are notified that the generalized disclosure about what is going on. I thought the knowledge meant that some of the of principles could not be fully implemented in the context of the National Security Surveillance Program was an acknowledgement you cannot provide the error correction notice in all circumstances. I was talking more about that secondary screening of the nofly list. But the challenge for you is to figure out the underlying values. In this context the underlying value is prevention of governmental abuse that is what animates everybody and with that behavior. The types of accountability and transparency you have to help build
Earlier wed been talking about the neutrality network, and Net Neutrality, i thought, was a little catchier. I didnt think it would catch on, but somehow it did. Host the president this week, proofer wu professor wu, spoke about Net Neutrality. Heres what he had to say. Im weighing out a plan to keep the internet free and open, and im urging the fcc to do everything they can to protect Net Neutrality for everyone. They should make it clear whether they use a computer, phone or tablet, internet providers have a legal obligation not to block or edit your limit to a web site. And they cant let any company pay for priority over its competitors. To put these protections in place, im asking the fcc to reclassify Internet Service under title ii of a law known as the telecommunications act. In plain english, im asking them to recognize that for most more thans the internet has become an essential part of everyday communication and everyday life. Host tim wu, whats your reaction to what the pre
The Bipartisan Policy Center and the Concord Coalition all offering their views. Live coverage on cspan2. The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in the case balancing federal whistleblower protections against National Security. The case involves robert maclean, a u. S. Air marshal fired for telling a reporter that the tsa canceled missions on commercial flights that required marshals to stay overnight. His supervisor told him that the cancellations were to save money, believing the tsa action risk passenger safety can maclean leaked the information to a reporter prompting congressional criticism and leading to the tsas reversal of his decision. Next up, the oral arguments in Homeland Security department versus maclean. Will hear arguments first this one in case 13894 of the department of Homeland Security versus robert maclean. Spent mr. Chief justice, and may place a corporate in section 114 r , congress directed tsa to promulgate regulations prohibiting disclosures that would
Is something that weve continued. So, its a long way of saying that as we think about our engagement, we have to address this question of failed states, but we have to figure out ways to do it that are sustainable, that we can keep going that we can resource and that we can bring all of government to bear on. And, of course, i should add, the private sector and other actors are absolutely critical. This summer something that you played a leadership role in, the africa leaders summit, we brought to washington, as you know, an extraordinary gathering of African Leaders and we worked with them to help unleash more growth in africa, also to deal with security challenges, institutional challenges. A key component of that was bringing the private sector to the table and helping to strengthen those relationships. Power africa is a wonderful example of the government and the private sector working together to help people in a meaningful way and to help economies develop a foundation that can c
Couldnt get the full accounting accounting. The 300 billion doesnt include come under budget how much is going into that basic research to find the basis for the major Mental Illness . Roughly 50 spirit what is your total budget . 1. 45. 12 are going to hiv. By the way, my state has ever had per capita incidence of hiv and my Patient Population a disproportionate number of hiv. I am absolutely where of the nature of the issue of hiv but it does seem, if we have too few dollars going to the Brain Initiative and youve got roughly 800 million going to something that basic research or something which is costing us at least 300 billion, probably far more, as important as the it seems like we should be throwing everything we have an understanding that basic sort of science regarding that. The 12 where does that come from . I mean i guess my priority, when i go back and look and we are spending 19,000 per death on hiv, ma ive a sense we probably spending probably 2000 her death on major Menta