merits of ending chain migration, modifying how we legally emigrate and the fact that we need to enforce our actual law at the southern border should not be up for discussion and quite frankly trump border concession is a step back from what he was originally proposing, he wanted 25 billion for 2,000 miles of concrete wall and now heather: this is his third attempt in terms of negotiating, changing the wall from concrete to steel slabs, the area that will be covered so raúl i ask you, it does seem that the president has been willing to negotiate, what about democrats up until this point? yes, look, absolutely, democrats have been at the table, have been at the table for a number of years, we have been asking for immigration that s going to be helpful to for americans and make sure that we have border security, so we need to make sure that this
i don t see democrats wanting to give up on the wall because the president has made it such a big campaign issue. democrats moved very far left on this issue, and, that has been best for such a calm campaign promise, and they get a clean at existence and came up with this idea of ending chain migration. i think it s unlikely at this point, but you never know. the last thing was, the other story that s obviously gaining a lot of traction and also being talked about on the democratic side a lot, are the two children who have died in u.s. custody along the border. you know, it s tragic, and horrible. the immigration system down
everybody that a year ago the president was offered 20 billion for his wall which is something he asked for. the democrats were willing to give that to him. at the last minute he turned around and demanded more things beyond that wall including ending chain migration, et cetera. he had the money for his wall and he chose not to take that deal at one point. let s go to rudy giuliani. listen to rudy giuliani talking to the hill and talking about the mueller investigation. then tell me what you think. let s play it. the thing they started investigating can t a crime. collusion. is there anything that mueller the second thing they investigated isn t a crime. collusion. the third thing, the ddonation. making the payment to stormy daniels and mcdougal.
beyond that wall including ending chain migration, et cetera. he had the money for his wall and he chose not to take that deal at one point. let s go to rudy giuliani. listen to rudy giuliani talking to the hill and talking about the mueller investigation. then tell me what you think. let s play it. the thing they started investigating can t a crime. collusion. is there anything that mueller the second thing they investigated ed isn t a crime. collusion. the third thing, the donatiodon. making the payment to stormy daniels and mcdougal. asking the fbi in the name of comey to go easy on flynn. he was doing what thousands of people do with prosecutors and judges and plead for mercy.
us. they need more willingness to enforce the law as it exists today. does he have a point? we become more informed over time. i also know a recent poll of border security agents showed that 95% of them agreed that more physical barriers would assist in the performance of their duties. this isn t an either or. we can have an all of the above strategy. but democrats keep voting against all things that we hope will keep the country safer like sanctuary city reform, like ending chain migration. in february when the democrats came forward and said we will give you $25 billion for border security in exchange for a pathway to citizenship for daca. i don t think we re ready for an amnesty deal. i think there s a time fuse there that is concerning to a lot of us.