1952 decision. In this case the justice is affirmed the separation of powers by determining that president truman act the beyond his authority in seizing control of the nations steel mills during the korean war wh and imminent strike was threatening to shut down the actions. The court ruled that the president s actions, unconstitutional because they had not been authorized by congress. Find out more next monday live at 9 00 p. M. Eastern on cspan, cspan3 and cspan radio. You can learn more about cspans landmark cases series online by going to cspan. Org landmark cases. And you can order the book featuring background, highlights and the legal impact of each case written by tony morrow and published by cspan. Landmark cases is available for 8. 95 plus shipping. Cspan has has a full lineup of veterans day programs for you. Join us tuesday night at 8 00 p. M. Eastern, a conference about veteransed organized by the chamber of commerce and the george w. Bush understand tult. On wednesday, cs
The u. K. Perspective on this. I also wanted to talk about the role on ideology. Aremany people, when you thinking about Early Intervention, the first thing that comes to mind is, you need to take on immediately the ideas , that political radicals would have felt. Have you found that to be the case in your experience when we are talking about islamic radicals . Deepes this result from person issues or deep societal issues . I think in my experience is, all you have is individual pathways are different. Some buy into a narrative. Verylook at the world as similar to what was old school. Now, you have the evil capitalist west which is hegemonic late dominating the world. It is a suppressing the natural aspirations of most people in the world. Instance, the west is islam. They look at everything in the world through that. They look at israel and palestine through the ideological mindset. They look at any conflict through a manifestation of another attempt of america to dominate the middle
To the new communications and transportation capabilities that weve developed. Given the shifting culture and those expectations for speed and ontime delivery, im reluctant. You have to look at the economics of all of this and the trade offs and costs, but i hate to see the Postal Service give up one, two, three. Thank you. Mr. Miller. Mr. Chairman two things. One, as i recollect, the rational for this change in Service Standards was developed after i left. I dont know the details of it. I hesitate to answer because without having time to analyze the data. Second, there is a trade off obviously. You cant do all things for all people. You have to make some choices here. Service standards should be an input into the question of plant and logistical rationalization it seems to me. I just dont have i dont have my hands on the information necessary i understand. Everything else equal. I think theres something nice about having as you characterize, a one, two, three kind of standard. You wou
The centers changed the standard of delivery and gone from one, two, three, days to modified one so au so if youre in the same met oe metropolitan area. Thats modified one. If were outside the area, you might get it. You may not. Modified one, two, three. I think the Postal Service would like to go to two, three. Two day even in the same metropolitan area. It would be one but two would be the expectation and three. In terms of whats appropriate for us, im not comfortable with the Postal Service saying this is how many Mail Processing centers we should have. Some people say the more appropriate thing for us to do maybe with the involvement of the Regulatory Commission is to consider whether or not modified one, two, three days of service is appropriate. One, two, three is better or two, three is just fine. I would welcome any comments that you all have in it regard. Ms. Kennedy. I picked on mr. Miller all afternoon. Maybe i should come to you. My first thought is if we have declining fi
Republican Pete Ricketts and Democrat Chuck hassebrook. We welcome those joining us on adt television and radio where they can a. G. Web site and also Nebraska Broadcasters Association Member stations carrying us today and welcome to those joining us across the nation on cspan2. We are live tweeting this debate. Use the hashtag and e. T. Debate on twitter to follow us and you can give us your comments during and after the debate on our Facebook Page. For the next hour the candidates will face questions from nebraska journalists and each other. The rules are pretty simple. Each candidate will have 90 seconds to respond to the question and if warranted me give a 30second rebuttal. Tonights debate is taking place before a live studio audience. We have asked the audience to refrain from a pausing or cheering because it will only take semifrom the candidates. Before we meet the candidates lets introduce the panel of journalists who will be asking the questions tonight. Fred knapp of net new