When we were writing the book, we really tried to find the first social scientist and policymakers that recognized that technology was doubling in performance and it was decades after the article. The social sciences were really reactive to the science and, you know, as a result, next slide, we are still playing catchup. So, you know, neil says anybody can make almost anything but right now 4 billion people are not connected, you cant have a digital fabrication if youre not digit le connected. Before we get to a fab divide which would hold on one second. Access is not binary, its not like you have it or you dont. One investors is Sesame Workshop and they do great job on inclusion and talk about continuation of access. Billions of people have a feature phone, thats all. Try rating a document, fabrication work flows on a future phone, so not even if you have access, you may have minimal access, cost is an issue so about 2 billion people have very limited access. So already most of the pl
The revolution of technology is going on now. Wondering, do you have any vocal support . Dr. Rand paul i think it is a minute a lot of american needs to understand. There is a 1000 year war between the suni and the shia. It is the same thing. The sunni dominates the minority. They persecute the minority. Yourultimately to figure at the sunnishia divide. We have to defend ourselves. When he to make sure that us going in doesnt work very well. [indiscernible] ok. [indiscernible] ao woman who might be on the staff. Ok. The you will consider you have any questions . I dont. The Public Education system is really important. We hope you will deal with that. One is now an assistant principal. The other one teaches sign language. He teaches sign language north of houston. I am the only senator ever to give a speech and sign language. One more thing, students cannot stand the debt theyre going to have. I know the government makes a lot of money. People educating themselves Public Policy we shoul
The most noticeable expression where it is the interpretation. I think that was the way that people feel in taiwan. I think that incident is the response that said there were Political Forces inside taiwan that wanted to provoke the situation. That was not very helpful at all in a people we had to get in a very angry manner in taiwan. But that shows how volatile the 1992 consensus or the different interpretation is in the eyes of the taiwanese borders. We need to think in a careful way what is good for the relations in between taiwan and china. As i say in the written part or what i have read earlier, the most important thing to what happened in 1992 is that the two sides decided to set aside the differences to move on for mutual interest. That is the kind of spirit that will follow in the years ahead in the negotiations or contacts between taiwan. Thanks so much. Congratulations. A really exciting event and thank you for you were really on your brief. It could be in the debate with no
Thank you, guys. At this point, ill turn it over to q a from the audience. As you ask your question, a gentle reminder, please ask, if you have a panelist, please let us know who it is and please ask a question. Thank you. Okay, my question will be about database sets. My names peter gisele, i work in a hospital laboratory, im not a computer geek. As a military veteran, i was interested in a bill that was in the congress a long time ago. My frustration is that 99 of the people i contact i never get feedback from. What i want to create is a website, a viewer easily available database that has database sets in it of like the members of congress, people in the executive branch, but also governors and that. But also academic professors so that i could, over my retirement years, contact these people and try to get feedback, but at least document on this website that contact has been attempted and no response has been given. Database sets are very expensive and i just dont understand why the