40,000 feet it looks clear if youre in the weeds its a little murkier. You mentioned the family jewels. Imagine the irancontra situation. You look at the cold war the human debris is massive. Where does he stand on these issues are how to see reflect . Is this just Collateral Damage because this is about right and wrong . Does he have thoughts about these things . If so what is his take . In that sense he is kind of a political strategist. If need be he was prepared to be ruthless. He signs off. You know he supports vietnam. A lot of things. So it is kind of the priority of the us soviet rivalry but there is also awareness of kind of the limits of american power. He is very cautious and you have to be very careful about where the United States intervenes and when it ask. He is inclined to be a little more he would act on occasion or did agree with certain acts, obviously the iraqi example. But he is kind of modest. Modest. That is where he differs from the neo conservatives are some of
Medical isolation room, the child or her children are assigned to that room with her, isnt that a fact . Are you talking about a particular case . Im not aware of that. Generally. When a woman is assigned to a medical isolation room, her child would be assigned to that room as per the reports that ill put into the record at this point. The mothers and children allegedly locked in a dark room for protesting detention conditions and also thats a think progress article. And also for the record, id like to tender a New York Times Magazine Article entitled a federal judge and a Hunger Strike take on the governments immigration detention facility. Without objection. And youre aware of those reports of the Hunger Strike and the woman with the 11yearold child who was placed in the medical Isolation Unit . And the assertion in the New York Times article that there is barb wires at our family facilities which is not the case. In the medical Isolation Units, those units are the unit that this wom
The comment made earlier about how to that people come i you let every two vet people, you let everybody run command you take the top two vote getters. You can watch the remainder of this event online at www. Cspan. Org. Breaking news out of boston, a jury has reached a verdict in the federal Death Penalty trial of Boston Marathon bomber dzhokhar tsarnaev. The verdict is an mad is expected to be announced momentarily. Lawyers are gathering in court. We expect to hear comments from the lawyers later on and we will hear comments from you, your reaction to the verdict in just a bit on cspan. Meanwhile, we will take you over to the Brookings Institution in washington. It is one week until tax deadline day. There in your screen is John Koskinen. He will be talking about how his agency is dealing with budget cuts. They are just getting started. Commissioner koskinen half of the book is dedicated to tax codes. There is a quotation from the book that we pulled. It says, the power to tax is the
Locally, but throughout the country. It is very needed. Thank you. My name is audrey, i am an associate professor. My question is, in light of the videotapes we have seen, where they are shooting people and just leaving them on the ground to die what are the legal grounds for police regarding giving lifesaving means when their shot someone. And the walter scott case, they live. They say they provided cpr, they did not. What are they legally required to do . To leave them there to die so not to mess with evidence . I was going to ask him, he stepped up for a minute. The question is, we pose the question repose the question. What are the legal requirements for police when using lifesaving means . Are they supposed to leave them there, so as not to disturb evidence . Or are they supposed to save their lives . In the walter scott case, they lied and said they did cpr. Can i have my cocounsel address this . We are dealing with the same issue in cleveland. I will be very direct in response.
The men of the uss yorktown were on the front lines. They knew better than anyone in washington the sacrifice necessary to protect liberty. They did not talk about strength and courage. They lived it. They did not seek war but with a they were there when called to fight. I believe that the men and women protecting our liberty deserve leaders who are accountable to the american people. The crew of the uss yorktown understood that our freedom and prosperity must be defended against those who would attack us. They learned the terrible lesson that war is not a game and should not be used for political advantage. Too many lawmakers in washington have not learned that lesson. In 1964, Ronald Reagan warned of the dangers, the dangers of seating our freedom to a little intellectual elite and a far distant capital who think they can plan our lives for us better than we can for ourselves. Freedom nurtured our country from a Rebellious Group of colonies into the worlds , greatest nation. When tie