The proposed rule is based on the early hundreds of studies that demonstrate the current standard is not protected. The studies employed multiple scientific methods and models as mentioned by previous speakers but the data are clear. The current ozone standard is not productive, protective of Public Health and the epa must issue a more protective standard. Thank you. Thank you very much doctor. Let me ask a few questions and let me start with dr. Weil nas. You have done some impressive work in rhode island studying heat related deaths and hospitalizations. Is ozone formulation, is ozone formation exacerbated by Climate Change in your view and what is the linkage between added heat and added ozone . Thank you senator for that question. At a local question in rhode island. In rhode island but we have looked at is the relationship between warm temperatures and extreme heat and the number of Emergency Department visits and deaths in the state of rhode rhode island and we have found a Stron
Know, the holy grail of i. T. Used to be four ts which still allows you time to update your systems, take them down if you need to, but you cant take down a water pump to update or patch the latest, you cant take down the water pump thats feeding the washington area, so it makes it very hard to align the needs of i. T. And opt t. , and that creates o. T. And that creates gaps that people looking to create nuisance can exploit. In the nearterm, mediumterm, the first thing is that nist met your name in report, Matt Skolnick to come up with a definition in a good way, yes. Any to come up with a dolby the definition for this government. The reports go to the president and recommendations have to be at the president ial level and actionable for the president. Its not going to be director private sector. It would what can the government do in certain areas. The first one was that nist should find for the u. S. Government what iot is. Its likely to be probably the last definition but least a
What is the suggested instruction you would have in order to eliminate liability in my hypothetical inJustice Scalia hypothetical . It has to suggest a serious intention of the speaker to inflict bodily harm. The instruction in this case. It wasnt requested. If you are saying it is waived, that is something else. The instruction given in this case does not meet the standard you just gave. Just is kennedy, i think it does. It was understood as being a reference to the speakers intent to carry out the threat. It seems to me if that is the case, you should have no problem at all to suggest the instruction of specific intent. As you well know all the time. Let me give you a couple examples of what mr. Elwoods position would cut out. It would cut out people who are reckless from the people consciously aware this would be taken as a serious expression of intent to do harm and the speakers are entirely disregard. How about using that exact and are quite it is standard to what Justice Breyer h
Saving for retirement and savings stated after retirement. And you reap lord says americans s accounts are rising. This is just under two hours. The finance committee will come to order. Would you take a look at the state of Retirement Savings in america, it is clear that something is out of whack. The american taxpayer subsidizes retirement accounts. Still millions of americans nearing retirement have little or nothing saved. The fact is the incentives and savings in the american tax code are not getting to those who need them most. Of the pack savings has about 59,000 set aside for retirement. According to the Government Accountability office, 9000 taxpayers have fire a ira accounts worth 5 million. It would take several lifetimes of work for the typical middleclass american to save that much money. How did the massive ira accounts come to be . In many cases they seem to be stock deals that most investors would never have access to. Executive buy stocks at a special rockbottom price
Bid for mylan. The price tag 40 billion, the largest potential takeover in the drug industry this year. The shares of mylan soared 8 and the shares for teva were higher. This could change the landscape of the industry but there is no guarantee anything about it will be easy. Megan tirrell has more. Another day and another deal in the drug industry. Nevas offer for rival mylan comes on the heels of mylans offer to buy periggo, a move some expected to be defensive. It contributed to deal activity among drug companies. You have to be big or you will get acquired. But mylan is not expected to go easily. Y rejected the idea of a merger with teva saying it will be a cultural clash and could raise antitrust concerned and teva dismissed that today and said they could close the deal by the end of the year. The Israeli Company said they could create a transformative generic drug company with revenue of 30 billion and there could be 2 billion in cost cuts it anticipated. Teva makes the multiple s