that s why this movement is illegitimate. again, i ll go back to the fact just like walter scott was murdered. you re saying that. he didn t get murdered? show me the data. lies, myth and propaganda do not substitute for empirical statute. a black individual is twice as likely to be stopped and harassed by police. clarke, you know that. let him finish. no. the police use of force. no, i m tired of him lying on your show. when you look at the police use of force and you enter race, you know what you get? according to a harvard research. no is statistics, clarke, you know that. this is about statistics. no pattern of any racism by the american police officer. again all i ask . oh, so profiling is not racism? a study, a peer review, empirical study. all right. we got to break here. i ll look at it. but today, sean, i have not been shown. i have not been shown any research that supports that lie. all right. thank you, both. appreciate it. coming up, drama
that single thing, which is to get us our democracy, fix the democracy, then turn this over to someone like bernie or hillary who has 10 or 12 great ideas of what they would like to do they would have a chance to do those great things because we would have a democracy that would be responsive to the people. right now we don t. the biggest empirical study of actual decisions by our government finds there is no relationship between what the average voter wants and what our government does. there s a tight relationship between what the elite want, the economic elite want and what our government does and what special interests groups wants and what the government it is but there s no relationship with the average voter. that s because the basic mechanism of this representative democracy has been lost. and until we fix that we will not get these other great fantastic ideas. that s why i think we have to focus on this reform first and get a reform that could make democracy possible. nothin
about seven or eight things that i m going to do, everything from dealing with immigration, dealing with student loan, dealing with climate change. then the mandate of that president is split among all those separate issues. and then when he comes in and he says i want to take on the problem of money in washington, then the lobbyists say, no, no, no, bernie, you were here to deal with the problem of climate change or you were here so these power, his capacity to take on these incredibly important issues gets divided. what i m saying if we can concentrate the mandate so there s no ambiguity. here s why this president is here. and then that president achieves that single thing, which is to get us our democracy, fix the democracy, then turn this over to someone like bernie or hillary who has 10 or 12 great ideas of what they would like to do they would have a chance to do those great things because we would have a democracy that would be responsive to the people. right now we don t. the