it s like a movie. who can you trust, right? because there s why if that s the case, assange says i offered the swedes and i d go talk to them, am i supposed to believe the swedes have a nefarious plan? we need to step back and look at wikileaks. wikileaks in my view is the most snifg can t single enterprise. what he did with cablegate, the afghan logs, pentagon, there s been over 300,000 stories around the world based off the reporting, based on the documents wikileaks have released. almost every major news story you check out there s a wikileaks connection to it. he s angered the most powerful governments in the world. that s why he s in this situation. can i ask a question? sure. given the fact that britain is signaling its willingness to
they re behaving as an agent of the united states in this affair which they did with i and which they ve done in the past. again, but my question is so is the uk. it doesn t make sense? what doesn t make sense? what doesn t make sense they might actually eventually extradite him. they can t now because he s in the embassy. let s hope they don t invade the embassy. so that could happen. richard, you re raising your hand and i would like you to ask a question. yes, please. exactly what he released, how much of it was like sop secret? isn t it really embarrassing
asking this question which is how is it app example. what would you have done? what would you have done with whose thought? i will channel tim geithner. neil barofsky, pony up. i don t think they re bad people. it resulted in the big banks essentially dictated the terms of their own bailout but as to that it s kind of comical, the famed defense. the answer to that, it s sort of funny. i made dozens of recommendations while i was at sig t.a.r.p. addressing these issues. really, almost countless recommendations to improve and make that program better that
diplomatic core in the united states being able to do some of its work in private. and so this is bad not just for the u.s. government but for people who are citizens of the united states and for people who want a stable diplomatic what s bad about it? hold that thought. hold that question. there s an empirical question. i want to get into both of those a little more right after we take break. okay, here s the plan. you have a plan? first we re gonna check our bags for free, thanks to our explorer card. then, the united club. my mother was so wrong about you. next, we get priority boarding on our flight i booked with miles. all because of the card. and me. okay, what s the plan? plan? mm-hmm. we re on vacation. this is no plan. really? [ male announcer ] the united mileageplus explorer card. the mileage card with special perks on united. get it and you re in.
and i was seququinty-eyed. i was suspicious. my concerns were not valid because the banks would never risk their reputations. they would never embarrass themselves. each of my roommates said that exact same line over and over again. but look. i want to be very cleefrmt patriotic americans, they sacrificed to serve their country. it s not personal about them but that problem of captured ideology which rewards that attitude with big pots of gold at the end of the wall street rambo when they leave and the ideology they bring in. that s part of the broken system that needs to change. i think what comes out of it is it s a question of do you go into this in the wake of the financial crisis, in the wake of what we know about what was happening viewing the banks as proven get until prove innocent? i think the rational thing would be to distrust the banks after