what we really need is much better coordination. treasure island is definitely an answer for all of these areas. we strongly endorse the project. it is a great project for the region, a great project for our economy, our people, and especially san francisco. as you saw today, there are many positive impacts in the short- term and long-term, and we look forward to getting the ball rolling with our strong endorsement, and we suggest that we get it going as soon as possible. thank you so much. i am here representing catholic healthcare west and st. francis and st. mary s hospital. we are here because we are very impressed with the division of this project. we want for you to support it and move forward with the development. we are very impressed because of the many things that had been said here before me, but most importantly, because of what is included when it comes to the health care of the population on the island. we look forward to being part of the dialogue that will m
are incorrect and inadequate. this memo appears to confuse the district financing. it is confusing with infrastructure financing. it is just like the redevelopment plan. it appears to pervade the memorandum. we respectfully disagree. he does provide his own take on what appropriate valuations are and what assumption should be. i am not an economist. i will not take that on. i will say we have abundant evidence. it supports the economic analysis. it appears to be a difference of opinion. a weird about the trust s exchange that is proposed. a word about the trust s exchange that is prepared. they have been replaced with the infrastructure financing district. it cannot occur under state law. the exchange act is not conditioned it on implementation of redevelopment. it is not in the exchange act. the legal test is set forth. it requires that the public trust purposes are met. the shift does not affect the implementation. they apparently disagreed that it has public trust valu