Like for example, his endorsement in the speech of Marriage Equality. It was a big moment in the speech, right . Because no president had ever talked about gay people before, ever before in any inaugural address. It was also a landmark thing for this president , who did not publicly support samesex marriage rights until well into his time being president. But there it was right in the inaugural address, calling for narn Marriage Equality. Right there in the inaugural address. That is freaking liberal. Also, that is the majority view held by most americans. The nbc wall street journal poll that came out last month polled on samesex marriage rights, a majority of americans support samesex marriage rights. So its liberal, but its also what the majority believes. Same thing on immigration. Part of the reason everybody called the inaugural such a liberal speech is because the president had a big multisentence, fullthroated endorsement of Immigration Reform. Even if you came here illegally,
Second inaugural address. And it wasnt just liberal in the abstract. It was liberal in the specific, in the sense that he proposed and endorsed a whole bunch of liberal policy ideas. Like for example, his endorsement in the speech of Marriage Equality. It was a big moment in the speech, right . Because no president had ever talked about gay people before, ever before in any inaugural address. It was also a landmark thing for this president , who did not publicly support samesex marriage rights until well into his time being president. But there it was right in the inaugural address, calling for 01 12 20 Marriage Equality. Right there in the inaugural address. That is freaking liberal. Also, that is the majority view held by most americans. The nbc wall street journal poll that came out last month polled on samesex marriage rights, a majority of americans support samesex marriage rights. So its liberal, but its also what the majority believes. Same thing on immigration. Part of the reas
Like for example, his endorsement in the speech of Marriage Equality. It was a big moment in the speech, right . Because no president had ever talked about gay people before, ever before in any inaugural address. It was also a landmark thing for this president , who did not publicly support samesex marriage rights until well into his time being president. But there it was right in the inaugural address, calling for Marriage Equality. Right there in the inaugural address. That is freaking liberal. Also, that is the majority view held by most americans. The nbc wall street journal poll that came out last month polled on samesex marriage rights, a majority of americans support samesex marriage rights. So its liberal, but its also what the majority believes. Same thing on immigration. Part of the reason everybody called the inaugural such a liberal speech is because the president had a big multisentence, fullthroated endorsement of Immigration Reform. Even if you came here illegally, there
I took the chairmanship in october 2010. The summary of the title is the federal government must stop sitting on its assets. We have taken on gsa and some of the billons buildings that have sat vacant. They continue the effort to get empty buildings filled. The report also talks about the northeast corridor, one of the most valuable assets in the entire world. It is an asset we are sitting on. It probably would will never be developed to its fullest potential by amtrak. This outlines part of our goal we had heard at that time they had developed those plans in december 2010. They were going to develop the northeast corridor and it was going to cost 117 billion and take 30 years. The most recent projection we have, they are looking at 151 billion. In 30 years. My premise is that it can be done and a third of the time, probably much less than it cost. They will tell you 31 million. They will tell you their success in the northeast corridor. The figures we have had 12. 9 million riders in
All of them safe from harm. President obama reflecting this is the fourth time he has been placed to play the role of consoler in chief because of gun crime. Are we truly doing enough to keep all of the children of this country the chance they deserve to live out their lives in happiness and what purpose . With purpose . I have been reflecting with this over the last few days. If we are honest, the answer is no. We are not doing enough. We will have to change. Then came perhaps the single most emotional moment, the president of the United States are reading the names of the 20 children who were killed. Charlotte Daniel Olivia Josephine Anna dillon madeleine katherine chase jesse james grace emily jack god has called them all home. For those of us who remain, let us find the strength to carry on and make our country worthy of their memory. In his emotional speech, he showed he can talk the talk when it comes to gun control issues. Now comes the hard part convincing politicians that this