Emergency ruling, called a shadow docket decision. the court is using that often to weigh in on major cases. here to explain, amy howe. explain this to me. how does a shadow docket decision differ from a typical supreme court decision and why is it a big deal that the supreme court is using it more? so, when we think about the supreme court, we think about the decisions on the merits, like on obamacare or the president s tax returns. in those cases the supreme court gets multiple rounds of briefing, including from people who may not be involved in the case but may have unique perspective, they hear oral argument in open court and months later issue opinions that sometimes in the case of the president s tax returns, for example, might be 70 pages long. and about 70 of those cases every year. everything else is what we call the shadow docket. what we talk about with the shadow docket are emergency
This judge, extremely succinct and straightforward with this ruling and noting he wasn t going very broadly with this ruling but he was in fact granting a victory to cnn and our chief white house correspondent jim acosta. saying that the white house must immediately restore jim acosta s hard pass that allows him access to the white house on a daily basis. so this judge taking it very narrowly. this was just this emergency ruling. this was on the temporary restraining order that would restore jim acosta s pass for the short period of time while the litigation moves forward. there s the broader issue here, whether or not the first amendment, what rights there are within the white house grounds. the government in that hearing on wednesday made that very broad argument that really the first amendment protections do not extend within the white house grounds and that the president, they said, has broad range to tell which reporters he will take questions from and to
They ve not had to contend with bauds they haven t had a lot of issues of having people, newcomers coming into town and having a lot of change to be quiet honest. people know who their neighbors are and their precincts are quite small. more and more americans want to vote. this issue has been raised in the last few months. is there any chance that will be any sort of emergency ruling in the next four days that will help people who still don t have physical addresses? this week we saw a couple of actions happen in the court. spirit lake nation along with six other plaintiffs filed a temporary restraining order to put a block on this voting id law and that was denied yesterday in federal court. it s still unclear whether or not the tribe or any of the plaintiffs will come forward to f try to appeal that at this late hour. what i think is remarkable in
some seven million people will probably be affected. what we went in asking for, the court to give us an emergency ruling to stop what the trump administration did last week or a little bit more than a week ago because it was supposed to, under the trump administration, take effect immediately under their order, and we can t afford to have that kind of uncertainty. reporter: it s one piece of a health care fight that started long before president trump stepped foot in the white house and is far from over. i think on the csrs, what you re seeing the president say is, look, i would be okay with making these payments if i get something for people in exchange, if i get something that actually helps people. reporter: president trump is set to attend a policy lunch on capitol hill tuesday with senate republicans. the president told fox s maria bartiromo he still thinks he can get the votes to repeal and replace obamacare. rick? rick: ellison barber in washington. right now police in
Forward with the affordable care. because many depend on it, some 7 million people probably affected if the trumpet ministrations efforts to kill the cost-sharing subsidy the people depend on to afford the deductibles and copayments and insurance, are taken away. was a timeline for your lawsuit? do you know when you re expecting something back from the court? we went in asking for the court to give us an emergency ruling. to stop with the trump administration did last week or a little more than one week ago. because it was supposed to come under the trumpet ministrations, take effect immediately under their order. and we cannot afford to have that kind of uncertainty. their people day today depending on their health insurance. there is a woman, rebecca in california, mid 30s. she is a quadriplegic, cousin visits to the doctor. she pays $15 and copayments for those visits. without those copayments being