Forward with the affordable care. because many depend on it, some 7 million people probably affected if the trumpet ministrations efforts to kill the cost-sharing subsidy the people depend on to afford the deductibles and copayments and insurance, are taken away. was a timeline for your lawsuit? do you know when you re expecting something back from the court? we went in asking for the court to give us an emergency ruling. to stop with the trump administration did last week or a little more than one week ago. because it was supposed to come under the trumpet ministrations, take effect immediately under their order. and we cannot afford to have that kind of uncertainty. their people day today depending on their health insurance. there is a woman, rebecca in california, mid 30s. she is a quadriplegic, cousin visits to the doctor. she pays $15 and copayments for those visits. without those copayments being made, part of the aca, guess
some seven million people will probably be affected. what we went in asking for, the court to give us an emergency ruling to stop what the trump administration did last week or a little bit more than a week ago because it was supposed to, under the trump administration, take effect immediately under their order, and we can t afford to have that kind of uncertainty. reporter: it s one piece of a health care fight that started long before president trump stepped foot in the white house and is far from over. i think on the csrs, what you re seeing the president say is, look, i would be okay with making these payments if i get something for people in exchange, if i get something that actually helps people. reporter: president trump is set to attend a policy lunch on capitol hill tuesday with senate republicans. the president told fox s maria bartiromo he still thinks he can get the votes to repeal and replace obamacare. rick? rick: ellison barber in washington. right now police in
some 7 million people will probably be affected. what we went in asking for the court to give us emergency ruling to stop what the trump administration did last week or a little more than a week ago because it was supposed to, under the trump administration, take effect immediately under their order, and we can t afford to have that uncertainty. reporter: one piece of a health care fight that started long before president trump stepped foot in the white house and is far from over. iong the csr s, what you re seeing is look, i would be okay with making the payments, if i get something for people in exchange. if i get something that helps people. reporter: president trump is set to attend the weekly policy lunch on capitol hill with senate republicans. that s set to happen on tuesday. the president told fox s maria bartiromo he thinks he can get the votes to repeal and replace obamacare. arthel? arthel: thank you. eric: the president turning attention to another big campaign promise,
Forward with the affordable care. because many depend on it, some 7 million people probably affected if the trumpet ministrations efforts to kill the cost-sharing subsidy the people depend on to afford the deductibles and copayments and insurance, are taken away. was a timeline for your lawsuit? do you know when you re expecting something back from the court? we went in asking for the court to give us an emergency ruling. to stop with the trump administration did last week or a little more than one week ago. because it was supposed to come under the trumpet ministrations, take effect immediately under their order. and we cannot afford to have that kind of uncertainty. their people day today depending on their health insurance. there is a woman, rebecca in california, mid 30s. she is a quadriplegic, cousin visits to the doctor. she pays $15 and copayments for those visits. without those copayments being
Still be in place. both the appeals courts would have had to rule that the bans on enforcement were improper in order for the government to begin enforcing the executive order, so it appears that s not going to happen. it appears growingly likely the resolution in this case is going to be in the supreme court, and the term of that court is going to end at the end of june. so it would seem that unless the government succeeds in getting an emergency ruling from an emergency agreement from the supreme court to hear this case before its term ends at the end of june, it s going to be the fall before this gets argued before the supreme court. so what it means is we now know that the government was not going to be able to enforce this executive order for many more months, craig. pete, you know these circuits better than just about anybody. fourth circuit, ninth circuit. are we surprised at all that this was the decision that came out of the fourth circuit, and based on what we know about