time in nine months, restaurants can resume indoor dining in some parts of california, and museums, zoos and even sports stadiums can reopen for limited in-person crowds over the next few weeks. in just moments california governor gavin newsom is going to join me live to talk about his state s reopening efforts and the recall effort against him in part over his handling of the virus, but we re going to start today with cnn s nick watt in los angeles and a closer look at the push to roll back restrictions. bars and gyms will close effective midnight tonight. reporter: one year ago today california s pay area announced the first stay-home order in the land. this week a new dawn in the golden state. we re thrilled. we re thrilled to be back open. reporter: angelenos in limited numbers can now eat inside restaurants again. we hope that the state doesn t yank it us from again. reporter: some movie theaters in tinsel town reopened after 362 days. we ve watching tom &
Putting the Navy to the Test: Chapters From the Diary of John D Long
theatlantic.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theatlantic.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
actually authorized an emergency appropriation just about 30 days ago seeing this problem coming. i can t say we saw the taliban offensive moving this fast, but the administration actually does have additional resources with which to use to bring these evacuees from afghanistan back home. as someone who has long supported american military withdrawal i think the president has made the right decision to temporarily surge forces to bring them home. it probably does mean we have to have some dialogue with the taliban as richard engel reported, right now the taliban seems to be at least standing aside as we seek to get some of our close allies out of the country. and in the short term it is probably going to necessitate us having some conversation with the taliban to make it clear to them that there will be consequences if they don t continue to allow these evacuations to happen. i think there will be some questions that need to be answered by the biden administration and the trump
speech-ifying, in a lot of the right kinds of language. from leaders of all stripes, in terms of making sure that we have done that. obviously, it needs to be faster, in a more considered effort, a larger effort, then it has been. having 6000 troops on the ground at the airport may facilitate that for people who can get to the airport. but there s a lot of questions as to how much of an evacuation effort we can mount, what role does the senate have? what role does congress have in pressuring the government, and finding ways, to make more evacuations happen? first of, all congress actually authorized an emergency appropriation, just about 30 days ago. seeing this problem coming. i can t say that we saw the taliban offensive moving this fast, but the administration actually does have additional resources, with which to use, to bring these evacuees from
pressuring the government and finding ways to make more evacuations happen? so first of all, congress actually authorized an emergency appropriation just about 30 days ago seeing this problem coming. i can t say we saw the taliban offensive moving this fast, but the administration actually does have additional resources with which to use to bring these evacuees from afghanistan back home. as someone who has long supported american military withdrawal i think the president has made the right decision to temporarily surge forces to bring them home. it probably does mean we have to have some dialogue with the taliban as richard engel reported, right now the taliban seems to be at least standing aside as we seek to get some of our close allies out of the country. and in the short term it is probably going to necessitate us having some conversation with the taliban to make it clear to
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.