the points you made in the talking point i agree with look, the constitution protects content of communication. it doesn t protect the fact of communication and that database is keeping simply a collect of telephone numbers for some period of time so the retrospectively if the government says we have a bad call made from a bad guy abroad into the united states, let s go check and see what kind of connections there are with that phone number. bill: i think most people would be convinced by that argument. right. now prism. bill: email thing, huh-uh. hold on a second. prism. the prism program we don t know all about it, but what we do know is following. bill: didn t you start it. you and president bush the younger? aren t you the architect of it. i wasn t read into it here is what we do know. first of all the request the from the nsa goes through fbi electronics surveillance unit whose responsibility is to ascertain that the request is regarding the communication of someone wh
the points you made in the talking point i agree with look, the constitution protects content of communication. it doesn t protect the fact of communication and that database is keeping simply a collect of telephone numbers for some period of time so the retrospectively if the government says we have a bad call made from a bad guy abroad into the united states, let s go check and see what kind of connections there are with that phone number. bill: i think most people would be convinced by that argument. right. now prism. bill: email thing, huh-uh. hold on a second. prism. the prism program we don t know all about it, but what we do know is following. bill: didn t you start it. you and president bush the younger? aren t you the architect of it. i wasn t read into it here is what we do know. first of all the request the from the nsa goes through fbi electronics surveillance unit whose responsibility is to ascertain that the request is regarding the communication of someone wh
the points you made in the talking point i agree with look, the constitution protects content of communication. it doesn t protect the fact of communication and that database is keeping simply a collect of telephone numbers for some period of time so the retrospectively if the government says we have a bad call made from a bad guy abroad into the united states, let s go check and see what kind of connections there are with that phone number. bill: i think most people would be convinced by that argument. right. now prism. bill: email thing, huh-uh. hold on a second. prism. the prism program we don t know all about it, but what we do know is following. bill: didn t you start it. you and president bush the younger? aren t you the architect of it. i wasn t read into it here is what we do know. first of all the request the from the nsa goes through fbi electronics surveillance unit whose responsibility is to ascertain that the request is regarding the communication of someone wh
lord knows when. this is the biggest nothing burger ever. it was a mistake. i said it was a mistake. obviously, if i could turn the clock back, i wouldn t have done it in the first place. by the way it was used was very damaging. tucker: it meant nothing. it was totally irrelevant. which raises the question, if i didn t mean anything, why did it hurt her campaign so much? she is an explanation for that, too. because the right-wingers in the media, the washington post, the new york time, wouldn t let her go. i know you had a new york times reporter here yesterday, and they covered it like it was pearl harbor. then, in their endorsement of may, they said, this email thing, it s like a helpdesk issue. so, it was always a hard issue to put to bed. but reported tibet in july and then it rose up again. tucker: okay, so, the new york time is biased against
lord knows when. this is the biggest nothing burger ever. it was a mistake. i said it was a mistake. obviously, if i could turn the clock back, i wouldn t have done it in the first place. by the way it was used was very damaging. tucker: it meant nothing. it was totally irrelevant. which raises the question, if i didn t mean anything, why did it hurt her campaign so much? she is an explanation for that, too. because the right-wingers in the media, the washington post, the new york time, wouldn t let her go. i know you had a new york times reporter here yesterday, and they covered it like it was pearl harbor. then, in their endorsement of may, they said, this email thing, it s like a helpdesk issue. so, it was always a hard issue to put to bed. but reported tibet in july and then it rose up again. tucker: okay, so, the new york time is biased against