insinuating russian collusion. before i get into comey and mueller, i want to talk about a decision that didn t make a lot of news but to me is extreme lire significant. a federal judge apparently gave judicial watch you as the president of judicial watch the ability to do additional fact finding into whether hillary clinton s use of a private email server was deliberate and an effort to thwart freedom of information. why now and what does it mean? the judgment has been waiting for other court cases to come to a conclusion to see weighs was out there to be found. he s upset about what the justice department and the state department did in terms of keeping away from the court and judicial watch information about this email scheme it was judicial watch s litigation that uncovered the clinton email server and all those emails.
done because we know when it comes to national security that s where it counts but the chairman it appears wants to be more loyal to the president than our dt duties on the committee there was a moment i have watch eed numerous times that i can t get over in which the chairman was asked directly if his source, as he refers to it, his source that there was some incidental collection associated with the trump campaign, his source for that was the white house itself. he would not deny that was the case. do you think it s possible that that is the case? that the white house is the source and this whole thing i l scheme? it s certainly possible and it s one of the only possibilities. from what we have been able to gather, he did not receive that information in our secured facility at the capitol so that leaves it just to the national security agency and the cia and from what we re hearing they
hillary s own doing. you know, because ultimately think bernie sanders getting a bounce and maybe he can win in a place like new hampshire and make her life more difficult. people are talking about bill clinton and his past could that be issue for her, i think that mostly engenders sympathy for her, except to the help offing of slamming and shaming her accusers. there is something there. over all the eye on the ball for republicans look at hillary clinton s absolutely disasterous record as secretary of state. look at her enormous credibility problems when it comes to honesty, when it comes to national security and protecting information that she was sworn to help keep secret and instead put it on bootleg, totally unsecure server. she lied over and over again about the email scheme. i think between that and clinton foundation mess there is a lot of smoke. martha: we have to leave it there, julie, guy, thank you. good to see you both. thank you.