holds. although she did also expressed some doubts during the interviews. so, i would say it s important we talk to her, because of the email exchanges. but i don t think she was a major player in this, personally. that being said, even if he was at the major player, would we hear from her on thursday? well, we may. i think the plan at this point is, since we worked so hard through the summer to basically object to utilize the testimony we ve received over the summer, which we ve done in prior hearings and i think that s been a useful whether the witnesses sitting at the table or on video. it s good information. but we did not video her interview, so it would be transcripts if they were going to use that. but we have plenty of other information as well. okay.
ultimately lead back to. him , anyway infamy on the possibility of the extent to which ginni thomas was involved. we ana we know that the know that the cast committee was asking for testimony from ginni thomas, we know they re email exchanges between eastman johnny thomas leading up to the point testimony. we know that there were textures exchanges between ginni thomas and mark meadows, and of course that is testimony. what could feasibly be learned from the wife of the supreme court justice? we know they re there at least ten emails between the two. eastman attorney thomas, and we actually only know the contents of one of them so far. it was an email in which she was requesting the mistreatment speak to a grassroots group called frontliners. and he actually released that email the other day, when our paper published the fact of these emails, as if to say, the washington post gets it wrong it is in this email shows just asking me to speak. but the truth is that we know that miss tho
capital. i mean, it was really scary for those people on that day. i think that is one of the things that greg jacobs is going to be able to bring out, given his email exchanges with mike eastman, saying basically, because of eastman, they are under siege at the capital. let s talk about vice president pence s chief of staff, he was with him on january 6th, but will testify in the hearing tomorrow, we will likely hear video clips from his deposition. he was on with wolf today. i want to be clear, do you believe those surrounding the president for giving you bad advice or do you blame the president himself? i think ultimately the buck stops with the president. he has the responsibility to listen to advice or discard advice. i also think there were people around the president who i think served him very poorly and i think gave a very poor advice. short warned the secret service that trump would turn
eastman, quote, was wrong at every turn. and you will see the email exchanges between eastman and the vice-president s council as the violent attack on congress was underway. mr. jacob said this to mr. eastman. thanks to your bullshit, we are under siege. you will also see evidence that john eastman did not actually believe the legal position he was taking. in fact, a month before the 2020 election, eastman took exactly the opposite view on the same legal issues. in a court it is the select committee s work to obtain information. we have had occasion to present evidence to a federal judge. the judge evaluated the fact and reached the conclusion that president trump s effort to pressure vice-president pence to act illegally by refusing to count electoral votes likely violated two federal criminal statutes. and the judge also said this.
independent forensic experts even though everybody knew, everybody in the political world knew the laptop was real, they knew those emails were real. most of us know people who were in email exchanges with hunter. and verified, yeah, that was definitely me. i definitely wrote that and so, but, you know, it s amazing the degree to which, you know, msm, mainstream outlets like the washington post would go to before they will believe corruption in the biden family whereas with donald trump, you know, any lunatic that walks across the street babbling some fairy tale this is and then they will win a pulitzer prize for it no, it really is it does bear, of course, more investigation because, as you point out, all of this stuff was going on directly involving the former vice president, president, and it was all done exactly, you know, based on