not only, it s that sort of call to action, it s really a warning that the public saying, look, this might put the country apart. i think it s a wink nod to his supporters. it also says, i was relying on the advice of my attorneys, saying that i got information from attorneys. i think that s a preview of the defense you re likely to see from, him all these people around me, and my time as president, telling me all of these things. i was just doing my best, i m just a simple country lawyer. all these people tell me what to do. i think that s what they ll present at trial. jessica, do you think this meeting has any impact on the timing of an indictment? i don t, realistically. this struck me as a pro forma meaning, so short. i think it only because the robust presentation of the facts of the law in one hour. it may have been an effort to by just a little bit more time, they re thinking being that, the department just have to at least, in good faith, evaluate the arguments in the pres
there are more charges, every time there s another indictment, his poll numbers go up, as does his fundraising. kirsten holmes, thank, you back with us evan perez. i m joined by a legal analyst, elie honig. jessica, roth elliott williams, carrie cordero. also with, his former fbi deputy director, andrew mccabe. a lot to get to, we re gonna focus on this, a lot, obviously. elie, i mean, this is an extraordinary document that was released today. the timeline of these alleged crimes, when it is, if, not hour by hour, day after day, it paints a very clear picture of communications, between these three now alleged coconspirators. it really does, anderson. john donny trump is now in way worse position that he was two hours ago. the big headline to, me they had the documents. that was the single most important mystery from the first indictment. that scene at bedminster, donald trump is out of the white house, he s talking about this very sensitive documents, showing that just happens
substantive power of this case. because a lot of times in the federal case, your case, as elliott jessica know, will rise or fall on the testimony of one cooperating witness, who himself was a criminal. this case, based on the indictment is based, on texts, whatsapp messages, photos, audio recordings, and testimony from a lot of witnesses, who are lay witnesses. not themselves involved in criminality. that is a really tough case to be. everyone stay with us. i m joined our democratic congressman, adam schiff. to manage the first impeachment against former president, was a member of the house select committee on january 6th. congressman schiff, your reaction tonight to this news, the former president is now facing additional charges, and with a third person involved. well, the evidence was already strong and the original indictment. in this superseding indictment, now you just see how much more evidence the special counsel has. there are evidently, cooperating witnesses.