Documentary should be grounds to dismiss the case against him. They say some of her statements, including concerns about the threat of violence to her, would be prejudicial to trump wolf bryan todd reporting for his brian. Thanks very much into our viewers, thanks very much for watching the news continues. Next on cnn tonight on 360 Breaking News, new reaction from the former president after he said its practically impossible to secure the bond, nearly half 1 billion. He needs to deliver seven days from now also tonight, the blood bath he promised if hes not back in the white house and why the battle over what he was actually talking about at a rally over the weekend may have overshadowed all the rest of what he said were keeping them honest and more Exclusive Reporting from haiti, how ordinary people there are taking Desperate Measures to try and stay safe from the growing violence good evening. We begin tonight with the former president and selfproclaimed multibillionaire telling a n
saying are you re going be dictator. i said no, other than day one and that s right, donald trump said he would not be a dictator if he s re-elected except for first day. what he would do in first 4 hours of presidential power. president biden acknowledging behind closed doors that he s not sure if he was running for re-election if it wasn t for trump. and senate shouting match, republicans walk out of a classified briefing. what they want in exchange for the support. cnn this morning starts right now. good morning, everyone. so glad you re with us. donald trump put on the spot in saying the quiet part out loud. under no circumstances, you re promising america tonight, you would never abuse power as retribution against anybody. except for day one. except for day one. want to close the border and i want to drill, drill, drill. that s not retribution i m going to be i m going to be he keeps i love this guy you re not going to be a dictator? i said, no, n
demand, which is our god-given right as citizens in this country. yeah. and derek johnson, ellie wrote a great piece and points out that joe manchin laid out in this whole op-ed he opposes the bill but not why. not specifically in the bill he doesn t like, didn t name one provision he didn t like. did he lay out in this meeting anything specific about the meeting that they doesn t like? no. we didn t talk specifics about the bill. we did make the case that protecting voter rights is not a partisan issue. this is not about democratic versus republican. this is about protecting the constitution, and the right to vote. the civil rights organization naacp has been in the same place for 112 years. fought against southern democrats in the 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s and fighting against republicans now. to make this a partisan question, that s because republicans say we don t agree with it, that s asinine to say the least. we will continue to put forth
towards the solution to ensure our rights to vote is protecteds. rev, you know, as ellie points out, manchin made is clear he doesn t have a specific objection, although chuck schumer says he s grog to lay out his objections. he essentially said the fact republicans don t like it is good enough for me. all i need to know. they don t like it, therefore, i don t like it either. i don t know how you get anywhere with someone like that. did it come up in the meeting he used to support reforming a filibuster. it s on hib website a few years ago thought it was fine about the filibuster. did anyone bring up his own history and ask him to defend his current position? we brought up the fact they have gone around this 60-vote filibuster on other occasions and ought to do it about this bill. senate bill 1. they ought to do it around the john lewis bill, and around the george floyd justice and policing act. if you can t do it now, then why