Right. And so again its a grand [skpefrplt ] and experiment and hopefully will be a positive one. We hope so too. In the alley, which is great, that is in the conditions of approval, forever publicly accessible. Right and our ownership will maintain it. Thank you. Briefly, if i may, too, commissioner hillis. The project authorization, one of the exceptions allows them the flexibility allows them to change the amount of flex space. Commissioner moore. It would be interesting for staff to report back the flex space and if we could encourage it, because were discovering many new angles how people are using space and what people are looking for . I would be interested to see real applications in terms of what comes forward. Commissioners there is say motion and second to approve the project with conditions on that motion commissioner antonini . Aye. Commissioner borden . A commissioner hillis . Aye commissioner moore . Aye. Commissioner [sa eug ] eau . Aye. Commissioner fong . Aye. Commiss
Receive any correspondence. The Historic Preservation reviewed of [speaker not understood] as their there appears to be no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances the Department Finds that the proposal is consistent with the planning code and recommends that the commission approve the project as proposed. This concludes my presentation. Thank you. Project sponsor. Good afternoon commissioners, im the architect for the project sponsor joliet nash who found this house in the Liberty Hills Historic District. Its a moderate proposal, 21. 5 wide, 75 wide deep lot that triggers the need for the variance. There is an extension into the legal required rear yard which is averaged to be 15 minimum and adjacent property is actually encroach even more. The properties on the side have been raised with garage. This property has a garage, but its hard to access, so the owners wanted the building raised slightly 18th. The family that intends to occupy the whole building is an extended family, and t
Grant the variance noting the Historic Resource and reducing overall encroachment into the rear yard. And the existing said the backs with the side and front. Very good, thank you. This case was continued to alloy additional time to review the submitted materials given that day. The subject property is currently a twostory Single Family residence. That is located at the real estate parcel roughly 36 away from the front Property Line of the proposed project including a horizontal and vertical addition to the front of the house, which would result in a 4bedroom, 4story singlefamily residence and expands the existing structure into a larger Single Family residence and significant portion of the lot. However, no work is being done and required rear yard and no variances are needed. The fourth story would be setback 15 from the front Property Line. And due to the sloping nature of the project site, the proposed guarding would be fully above grade on the front of the building, but below grad