Manuscript of his experience of the cia. They came back to him and said to him and his publish of their 339 passages we have to delete they are revealing a National Security information for they went to court, they fought over, the cia cut that from three to 39 down to 168 and at the end of the day 30. The publisher put out the book with white spaces for the 30, boldface for the 160 they did in the tally for the other so as an object lesson in how subjective so much of this Government Data that was the formal start of the review process inside the process. So they dicker through the review process he did submit it before publishing the book . The case of monopoly to the Supreme Court was about a guy named frank who did not submit his book. That is what the judge is referring to the bolton case when he said bolton is risking losing his royalties. In 1980 he upheld the seizures of his book advance, all of his Royalty Income because he did not give the book to the cia for review. Now the
The cia came back to him and his publisher and said theres 339 passages here you have to delete because they are revealing National Security information. They went to court, they fought over, cia cut that number from 339 down to 168. In that the end of the day, 30. The publisher put out the book with white spaces for the 30, bold face for the 160 they caved on, and italic for the other. So theres an object lesson how subjective this can be. Thats the formal start of a review board process inside the intelligence community. But he did go through the review process . He did submit it before publishing the book . Guest rights. The case and went all way to the Supreme Court was a man named frank who did not submit his book. Thats what the judge is referring to the bolton case when he said hes risking losing his royalties. In 1980 the Supreme Court upheld the seizure of all of his royalties. His book advance, all of his royalty income. Because he did not give the book to the cia for review.
Delete because they are revealing National Security information. They went to court and cut that over and cia cut to 339 to 168 and at the end of the day 30 publicker put outed publisher put bold space and so much of this can be. That was process inside the intelligences community. He did go through review process. Right, the case that went to the Supreme Court was about a guy named frank who did not thats what its referring to in bolton case. Bolton is risking losing. In 1980 the Supreme Court upheld the seizure of all of royalties. He did not give the book for review. The government admitted it didnt have classified information but what they went after snip on he violated his contract and the Supreme Court without holding oral arguments without even fully briefing took away all of his royalties in the snip case and the irony is and book tv would love this is that years later when researchers got into the justices papers they found that Justice Powell drove that opinion because he was
accomplices to shoot up the homes of democrats and now investigators want to know if drug sales fuelled his campaign. and elise stephanic is denying she knew anything about george santos deceptions. she spent a year doing everything in her power to get him elected in that district. cnn is going to take a look at that relationship. it is a busy money morning but first we ll get to this. the nation reeling from the deadliest mass shooting since uvalde. investigators senching for a motive after a gunman massacred ten people and wounded others at a ballroom dance hall here in southern california. police say the gunman shot killed himself when police finally tracked him down after his bloody rampage. cnn is learning he used to be a frequent here at the dance hall he attacked. we re told the shooter went to a second dance hall after the shooting to kill more victims but the people inside wrestled away his gun before he could hurt anybody and drove off in his van. he was disa
Predecessors back to 1792 throughout the nations history. Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here today for a peaceful transferral of power after the election . There has been rioting in louisville, theres been rioting in many cities across the this country, including your socalled red states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election . We have to see what happens. You know that. Ive been complaining very strongly about the ballots and the ballots are a disaster. I understand that but people are rioting. Do you commit to making sure theres a peaceful transferal of power . Get rid of the ballots and well have a very peaceful there wont be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. Uh, the ballots are out of control. You know it, and you know is i dont know that. And the democrats know it better than anybody else. Joe biden called the president s comments irrational and a few prominent republicans are pushing back, most notably mitt ro