Right and the right side of that. So, pretty much the same progress for the next 90 days, as you heard before, were going the continue the structural steel erection in the central heading east, theyre starting to head west with the second crane in the next 30, 40 days, youll see us crossing 4th street which needs to be done at night, that will be continual night closures to get that work completed. Coming online in the next 90 days is stairs and ladders as well as transitioning from just doing mep coordination to start doing lay out in the field and with luck and everything goes according to mrab, well start pouring train box lid decks and then upper level decks as we go forward on and in there the summer. Labor breakdown continues to be consistent, percentages weve seen for the project and same with the percentage of apprentices, and again just the ongoing continual count of number of people that have come on to the project as crafts people, 2500 alone just in the Transit Center. I wa
Between 19. 455 and 28 Million Dollars, [inaudible] in this amount of 19. 55 Million Dollars, pacific erectors bid was [inaudible] but 5. 4 Million Dollars above our budget of 14 Million Dollars, and were commending to award it to pacific erectors for the point of [inaudible] and fund the balance from the reserves. This isnt the skin, right . No. This is other panels. These are panels and closures around the staircases, the elevators and escalator areas, i tried to put some photos in there. Okay. Motion . Second . Ill second. Without objection. Okay, it pass passes unanimous. No matters of the public wishing to address you, now it passes unanimously. Er moving on to item 10, approving an amendment to contract number 0804cmgc000, authorizing Webcor Obayashi joint venture to execute a trade work subcontract with olson and company steel, the sole responsive bidder for noshed amount 10 million 323 thousand 242 miscellaneous metals thereby increasing authorized direct toss by 10 million 323
Residential model would produce an anchor grocery store. There was a question raised about a master plan, you only have authority over the Transit Center, there are 6, 7 other buildings going up, tens of thousands of people and at least i dont think there is any general plan of what services that have to be provided that are absolutely required if the project is going to succeed and realizing the circumstance without cars. I dont know whats going to happen when you get these proposals in june, but it seems to me that theres a lot of thinking that still should be done about how the retail works out, even though it would be lovely to get retail in here and have them paying money so that the deficits that have been accumulating over the last few months can be resolved. On the sponsorship question, supervisor or famous people, theyre not named after corporations. I think to name it the google Transit Center or the twitter terminal would be bad in many, many, many respects. I think the term
Are moving people throughout the state and areas that are dont have as much of a workload and moving them to bay area, so they have a lot of their carpenters now on the list that are available, so they see no issues as well. Then the laborers are working with webcor, in a few slides, youll show the fruit of that effort in the diagram. Showing back to a slide with steve, bringing us back to the hours of apprentices, we have over 231 thousand with the majority from San Francisco and of that showing our meeting our goals of taking out the operator s and laborers. This is a grap weve shown here, you can see the last corridor how we talked, there was a dip in the labor apprentices, you can see the red, orange aish area has shown some fruit to that effort and it will continue going forward. And with the operators, the operators continue to have very good numbers on their apprentice front and then this is a graph of all the as you roll them all for all crafts, so to wrap up my presentation, i
People, theyre not named after corporations. I think to name it the google Transit Center or the twitter terminal would be bad in many, many, many respects. I think the term limits if you expect to get money from philanthropy, you cant put terms on it which is not a particular good idea, and i dont know i talked to the gentleman who gave the proposal afterwards and he had no idea how much money was required and he acted like he hadnt talked to anybody yet and two months is not a very long period of time to go out, go in the neighborhood and find millions and millions of dollars for sponsorships. It seems to me unless something comes back, its really great, youre much better off waiting until this project has the kind of visibility of what people actually see, particularly the park. You should be able to raise 30 Million Dollars from philanthropy to fix the park problem, you really should but its not something you can do in two weeks with an rfq. Its a lot of work and i would suggest yo