was listening to the great interesting conversation with kelly about it being difficult to prove but this stench think, you know, you remember there used to be a day when that kind of stuff just lead to shame in and of itself. and certainly kept you out of political life later. but that s not there anymore either. whether you can prove or not prove quid pro quo, that absence of revolving door that you described is compelling. well, the shame issue here, i, think is compelling, ali, because obviously, the republicans, particularly trump partisans, are aware that it is shameful to use government service or family connection to government service, to make private gain for yourself, and have private business game. because they use this as a way to try to attack president biden s family, for example, all the time. they know that this is something that is shameful and terrible, and that nobody should ever want to do, and they try to pin all sorts of stuff with that kind of a ca
and certainly kept you out of political life later. but that s not there anymore either. whether you can prove or not prove quid pro quo, that absence of revolving door that you described is compelling. well, the shame issue here, i think, is compelling, ali, because obviously, the republicans, particularly trump partisans, are aware that it is shameful to use government service or family connection to government service, to make private gain for yourself, and have private business game. because they use this as a way to try to attack president biden s family, for example, all the time. they know that this is something that is shameful and terrible, and that nobody should ever want to do, and they try to pin all sorts of stuff with that kind of a category on all sorts of democrats. they know it s wrong. but when they do it, they re assuming, you know, there is assuming that if we bring it up, that there shame will, that there shame isn t operable. it s a strange phenomeno
begins to look like a blueprint for contesting future legitimate elections. and although georgia lead the way in 2020, it s looking entirely possible, likely, even, that in 2024, pennsylvania maybe ground zero for an election takeover. let me explain this to you. this is doug mastriano. he secured the republican parties gubernatorial nomination in last tuesday s primary in pennsylvania. while denying the results of the 2020 election have today, become something of a litmus test in donald trump s republican party, that mastriano was way ahead of all of that. use before voters were going to the polls, to decide between trump and biden, mastriano was warning of a hit clarion push from the american left. in 2001, in a thesis that mastriano wrote, when he was setting at the air force s air command and staff college he envisioned a future where american democracy had collapsed, a dictator had taken over, and millions had died in
begins to look like a blueprint for contesting future legitimate elections. and although georgia lead the way in 2020, it s looking entirely possible, likely, even, that in 2024, pennsylvania maybe ground zero for an election takeover. let me explain this to you. this is doug mastriano. he secured the republican parties gubernatorial nomination in last tuesday s primary in pennsylvania. while denying the results of the 2020 election have today, become something of a litmus test in donald trump s republican party, doug mastriano was way ahead of all of that. use before voters were going to the polls, to decide between trump and biden, mastriano was warning of a hit clarion push from the american left. in 2001, in a thesis that
with their daily antics, and this plus all that happened on capitol hill with the filibuster, with their election takeover, it s been a very bad week for joe biden. maria: so what does this mean for the future? i mean, what do these failures tell you about what s to come? i know you have a vote this week in the senate. can you walk us through what we are going to see on wednesday when chuck schumer pushes through trying to eliminate the filibuster. yes, indeed. and bear in mind, they re trying to eliminate the filibuster to push forward their radical agenda, the socialist takeover. but they used the filibuster this week to block a vote on ted cruz s nord stream 2 sanction bill. so very hypocritical. but once again they re going to try to do away with the filibuster to blow up the senate so they can blow up the courts,