now, did you notice a word missing there? an actual apology or any acknowledgment of wrongdoing o fox s part recognizing that the court found statements to be false it is not the same as admittin that you were the ones spreading those fals statements how costs to outsiders i clear. but the real important part, what about fox viewers the network never had to acknowledge to its audienc that what it did was wrong the settlements with dominio might be disappointing for tha very reason. the network is still escapin accountability beyond th financial. but we should be clear here, fox is not out of the wood yet. the network faces a lawsui from former producer abb grossberg who claims that fox lawyers tried to manipulate he testimony during that th dominion case. in fact, just yesterday, msnbc obtained new audio of a call between grossberg and former pro trump advisor peter navarro, in which he privately blaste trump lawyer sydney powell and
missing there? an actual apology or any acknowledgment of wrongdoing o fox s part recognizing that the court found statements to be false it is not the same as admittin that he wears the one spreadin those false statements how costs to outsiders is clear. but the real important part, what about fox viewers the network never had to acknowledge to its audienc that what it did was wrong the settlements with dominio might be disappointing for tha very reason. the network is still a-scape i accountability beyond th financial. but we should be clear here, fox is not out of the wood yet. the network faces a lawsui from former producer abb grossberg who claims that fox lawyers try to manipulate he testimony during that th dominion case. in fact, just yesterday, msnbc obtained new audio of a call between grossberg and former pro trump advisor peter navarro, in which he privately blaste trump lawyer sydney powell and
of the acrimony of a divisiv trial, allows the country to move forward from these issues now, did you notice a word missing there? an actual apology, or an acknowledgment of wrongdoing o fox s part recognizing that the court found statements to be false it is not the same as admittin that you were the ones spreading those fals statements now the reputation will cost t outsiders is clear but the real, important part what about fox viewers the network never ha acknowledged to its audience that what it did what s wrong. the settlement with dominion might be disappointed for that very reason, the network i still escaping accountabilit beyond the financial but we should be clear here, fox is not out of the wood yet. the network faces a lawsui from former producer, abby grossberg, who claims that fox s lawyers tried to manipulate her testimony durin the dominion case. in fact, just yesterday, msnbc
diligence, whether it wa reckless, whether it was simpl reporting as a network intense on an extremely newsworthy matter argued by the the president of the united states himself. can you hear the tightnes and the vocal cords there? if you caught that parenthetical emission of truth, it was obviously lies, khama go on, in the middle there, of that little segment there, briefly, that s what you got o fox. again, the hope or promise, it did seem possible at some level, if this trial had gone on, i it continued, it would hav inevitably penetrated that fox news belt to some degree whether the network covered it or not, they probably wouldn t i have to say it s als possible that wouldn t hav happened, fox is so completely monopolizing viewership, particularly instructed thei viewers to distrust others
about the settlement this had to do with the ide that dominion voting machines, former president trump and allies made this case on fox and elsewhere, they were somehow stealing votes fro donald trump and flipping hi for joe biden. that s obviously false those are conspiracy theories. the case would have revolved around whether fox had done du diligence, whether it wa reckless, whether it was simpl reporting as a network intense on an extremely newsworthy matter argued by the the president of the united states himself. can you hear the tightnes and the vocal cords there? if you caught that parenthetical emission of truth, it was obviously lies, khama go on, in the middle there, of that little segment there, briefly, that s what you got o fox. again, the hope or promise, it did seem possible at some level, if this trial had gone on, i it continued, it would hav inevitably penetrated that fox news belt to some degree