well, in a piece of political irony, sales of hillary clinton s best selling book hard choices are falling fast. despite the fact she was reportedly paid a $14 million advance. and now adding insult to injury, mrs. clinton s book has been bumped from its new york times best seller spot by a book from one of her harshest critics. we have more from the west coast bureau, trace? that s edward kline, former editor for news week and new york times magazine, compared to bob woodward of the post, and the critics on left and right long accused him of being heavy on block buster accusations and very thin on sourcing. his new book blood feud describes the relationship between the clintons and obamas, which if you believe him, make the hatfields and mccoys seem lovy dovy. the details of the back that there was a physical altercation
well, in a piece of political irony, sales of hillary clinton s best selling book hard choices are falling fast. despite the fact she was reportedly paid a $14 million advance. and now adding insult to injury, mrs. clinton s book has been bumped from its new york times best seller spot by a book from one of her harshest critics. we have more from the west coast bureau, trace? that s edward kline, former editor for news week and new york times magazine, compared to bob woodward of the post, and the critics on left and right long accused him of being heavy on block buster accusations and very thin on sourcing. his new book blood feud describes the relationship between the clintons and obamas, which if you believe him, make the hatfields and mccoys seem lovy dovy. the details of the back that there was a physical altercation
contraception. listen. we should be afraid of this court. five guys should start determining what contraceptions are legal or not? that court decision is a frightening one that five men should get down to specifics whether a woman should use a diaphragm and it s not her boss s business. despite her leadership position and the fact some media ran with the statement, not one major media outlet bothered to challenge her on the facts. not one, until this broadcast last night. nancy pelosi other doesn t know what she s talking about or is intentionally misleading you. the gender of the justices in the hobby lobby majority is irrelevant. when roe versus wade was decided it was all-men in the majority. is it only when a judge disagrees with miss pelosi his gender is an issue? if speaker john boehner made a similar chent about female justices nancy pelosi would be crying sexism. the five men in the hobby lobby majority did not determine what couldn t exceptions are legal nor di
contraception. listen. we should be afraid of this court, that five guys should start determines what contraceptions are legal or not. that court s decision was a frightening one that five men should get to the specifics of whether a woman should use a diaphragm and pay for it herself or her boss. it s not her boss s business. that would be frightening if it was true, but it was not. despite the pelosi s leadership position and that the media ran with the position, not one media outlet bothered to challenge her on her purported facts. not one until this broadcast last night. nancy pelosi either doesn t know what she s talking about, or is intentionally misleading you. first of all, the gender of the justices in the hobby lobby majority is irrelevant. it s an attempt to stoke resentment. when row v. wade was decided, it was men in the majority, were those justices ill-equipped to fairly decide that case, or is it only when a judge disagrees with ms. pelosi that his gender
done in order to do so? guest: i hope so. i hope the wink and nod fades out, and personally, i hope he s re-legislated because the alternatives are worse. i want to put that out there. there s also there s the pressure to protect him. also looking into what a second term may possibly be, it s very likely we d still be at the very least a republican dominated house, possibly senate, and so those first two years when there s the window of opportunity may have gone, hopefully, and for my perm perspective, people may be outraged by the second midterm, and maybe they re will be a democratic majority in the house and senate, but there s a lame duck two years. i m sorry, i can t bring much more home. bouncing about. a lot in 2008. looking at the lens of the political scientist outside of those rigorous statistical models, doesn t look all that great for those, for that possibility. i m hoping it will be a seat change in congress and that there is a re-election, but, again, you r