up some of these costs so high that any pull-back from that is seen as some kind of draconian cuts. he has doubled it. this is the problem with the beltway definition of cut. it is not a cut, it is just a slower level of spending increase that they define as a cut. if this is money thrown out to everyone, it doesn t make college more affordable, because colleges over time are very efficient at pocketing that extra money that comes from the federal government, tuition rises accordingly. as collin pointed out performance levels are flat, the tea party is asking why are we spending more and more money without much to show for it? that s the issue. romney makes a turn, pins it on accountable, teacher tenure, vouchers and choice and he can win the education argument?
up some of these costs so high that any pull-back from thatseef draconian cuts. he has doubled it. this is the problem with the beltway definition of cut. it is not a cut, it is just a slower level of spending increase that they define as a cut. if this is money thrown out to everyone, it doesn t make college more affordable, because colleges over time are very efficient at pocketing that extra money that comes from the federal government, tuition rises accordingly. as collin pointed out performance levels are flat, the tea party is asking why are we spending more and more money without much to show for it? that s the issue. romney makes a turn, pins it on accountable, teacher tenure, vouchers and choice and he can win the education argument? i think he can.