Does the rule of four have to do with the Supreme Court and how cases are heard . Guest i think we have a winner. The rule of four is often known as granting a writ. In order for the Supreme Court to hear case, it takes at least four justices to agree to hear that case. It is also known as the rule of four. Host congratulations, you will win a copy of this constitution. We will get your information off the phone so hold on the line and they will take your information we will make sure this gets sent to you, congratulations. Here is natalie from twitter guest we love the Iron Triangle questions because students lose sleep over this. This is the simple fact on the test, the Iron Triangle will ask you what are the three points . Lets make sure we know the three points. Congressional committees, and interest group, and the federal Bureaucratic Agency. It basically space to the interrelationship and how Public Policy is passed and enforced. Its different than issued network. They talk about
Is there anybody in the right mind who believes that as an unforeseen circumstances with the current market is anyone who believes you would utilize the entire 48 billion in the coming fiscal year . Not that i know of. Not that i know of either. So you have 40 billion sitting in the bank, and because of some stupid federal law, you have been required to access taxpayer money. By the way, are you going with h. R. 1028, acted and unnecessary are opening 2013 . You think its a good idea . You dont have to say. Its complicated. I know you do. That act which stops this stupid bark at get us off the treadmill. If you were in trouble i would be happy to jump on you. Hound you pretty good. Because 48 billion in the bank and you dont think you have to use it, and yet we are having another hearing today. I have a friend who just bought a 200,000 condo. It took 50,000 down. Thats pretty good, right . They had to borrow 150,000. They have an auto loan, credit card, they owe about 175,000 have abou
Strategy to take this cost to the Supreme Court. They could wind up heroes or goats us back how much did you know about lgbt, had you reported on the lgbt Civil Rights Movement before . Guest not extensively. Host what kind of reporting it to don . Guest a lot of legal reporting. Host on lgbt transferred no, no. On bush the door bush v. Gore. I had written about constitutional law but not specifically about this issue except to the extent that i covered legislators, silly unions would come up. Unions, legislation would come up in each of them and this is probably in the early 2000s. Its funny to think today, that was very controversial in these. So i covered these legislative battles over civil unions but certainly not the landmark cases that you were involved in. Host what kind of experience have you had with the lgbt Civil Rights Movement . Youve talked a lot about the gay establishment. What kind of expense have had with the organizations that have been leading lgbt civil rights for
Gamechanging kind of potential to have someone like ted championing this cause, and it had the potential it turn it from what had been at best a partisan fight into a debate about civil rights. And so they then set out to find the plaintiffs. And ted actually had wanted a different kind of he had a specific set of criteria. He wanted a bookstore owner. He wanted a cop. And i forget what the other two they wanted six altogether because they figured what if the opposition turned up something in somebodys background. They just wanted to have more, and he didnt want any children. He thought that that was a complicating kind of factor, which is, of course, really ironic because if any of you have followed this, when Justice Kennedy when these cases finally got to the Supreme Court, it was the kids that Justice Kennedy was very focused on, like what about the 40,000 children of gay couples in california . Dont they have arent they part of this story . Arent they part of this argument . Why s
Openly guy player in the nfl. Attorney general erik holder is calling samesex marriage the civil rights struggle of our generation. Today theyll give gay couples in all states legal rights from everything from courts to prison. We will never stop working to ensure that equality under the law is protected by the law. A pledge from the u. S. Attorney general himself is the latest move by the Obama Administration to recognize samesex marriages to the greatest extent possible. [ cheering ] the Justice Department is taking additional steps to further advance this fundamental truth, and to give real meaning to the windsor decision. Edie windsor is a lesbian whoslesbianunder the new poliy same sex spouses will now qualify for benefits within federal programs like the september 11th Victim Compensation fund and in federal prisons same sex spouses will now have visitation rights. It applies to legally married gay couples even if they live in states that do not recognize samesex marriage. This m