passengers somehow involved in this, and the passenger getting into the cockpit or the passenger able to get to finagle some key mechanical system that is behind or in front of the cockpit door. well, what is disturbing about this incident is that we should have been analyzing and assessing the passengers from die one. when you do an investigation like this, you want to look at the plane, and the individuals who have the stolen passports, but in tandem, a forensic por ral forensic analysis of all of the passengers. you want to do an assessment on the passengers as well. do we know that it was not done from the beginning? it appears that it was not done, but do we know for sure? well, it looks that way, because everybody was steered to mechanical, technical, and nobody wanted to talk about this in the beginning sglcht and you are right. everybody said it appears to be a catastrophic mechanical failure, and something happened
to prove your innocence. but the last couple of cases i tried where my client testified i regretted it and in the final analysis i now truly believe a jury is better off speculating opposed to hearing the defendant. mark twain said better i keep my mouth shut and you think i m a moron then i open my mouth and proves it. and it shifts the burden from the prosecutor showing their case now it is the defendant proving to the jury they did not do it and they are not guilty and that is a difficult position for a defendant. you want the prosecutor to be the one in the hot seat and have your tone say, they didn t do their job opposed to the prosecutor saying, could you believe a word casey anthony said. she has been lying to everyone from die one and she lied to you yesterday. it is hard to tell who is on which side. the defense got a boost from