go from montgomery station to the ballpark, they are often taking part to civic center or beyond to make sure the can get on the train, just standing room to get to the ballpark. that is not a very efficient use of bart. in five years, the area will have a new transportation hub in the trans bay terminal. there will be nil muni line south of market that are being proposed not financed. most economists believe in five years we will have a much stronger economy. we believe there will be higher and better uses than this one. although this used did begin a year ago, this is not a situation of a party knowingly violating the law. i think it is pretty clear, when you look at the use in this neighborhood called community commercial barrage garage. that use allows a parking news which provides parking for operators, employees, clients, and/or visitors of a primitive or approved conditional and non- residential use in the vicinity. naturally, restaurant visitors, visitors to pd
involves the school. as has been mentioned, very few if any of the faculty or students are using cars, and they seem to be accommodated. even with the increased attendance, i do not see that as being an issue here. it certainly is always good to have discussions. but i feel comfortable with the informational master plan. hopefully, neighbors can get together and deal with the general problems that exist in the neighborhood, if there are some. commissioner borden: i think this is more of an anti-gay issue. more of an mta issue. if only two out of 10 students drive, that is better than most employers and most places here in the city. i would not put the burden on them to do even more than they they seem to be doing quite well in that space. if you want to have a conversation with mta about this, they said the parking rates in other parts of the city. i do not think the onus is on the school law. i think the school is being targeted because it has growth overall. given the h