posits a theory, president targets for presidential immunity, for those people who arec+ interested in this case aa path to terrifying in a lawsuit makes a huge amounta=ijt e:kdiscipline. if there s one characteristic that seems to be absent from the trump personality, it s verbal discipline. blamingú 4(c the victim is a a dangerousx particularly for a public figure. and the president, you know, we have seen this in the russia investigation, where if he had simply abstained fromny?çz twee sorry abstained from talking to himself in now. the same i think will be true as he engages particularly on the specific allegations women have made against him. because these public statements that he makes couldjet l ed admissible in court, they could be springboard for further
was there reasonable expectation of privacy. if you look at the context of which it s given, it s in a bathroom. certainly when yub near a bathroom wearing a microphone, the issue is listen i didn t anticipate that that would occur. you re wearing a microphone in a public bathroom and you have an expectation of privacy? time-out. private bathroom in the studio. number two the issue is whether there was state action. there s going to be the argument advanced by attorneys that the media in this instance was working as abagent of the state. how coincidental that his arrest coincides with the last episode of an hbo documentary of his life. they had been working with the documentary producers for some time. far frommed ed admissible in court. it s underwell ming that this evidence is underwell ming. this is not the only evidence.