new for old but made to look like new bottles. i’m new for old but made to look like new bottles- new for old but made to look like new bottles. i m actually going to that. it s new bottles. i m actually going to that it s going new bottles. i m actually going to that. it s going to new bottles. i m actually going to that. it s going to be new bottles. i m actually going to that. it s going to be in new bottles. i m actually going to that. it s going to be in july, - new bottles. i m actually going to that. it s going to be in july, i m i that. it s going to be injuly, i m very that. it s going to be injuly, i m very excited and yeah, i cannot wait you the very excited and yeah, i cannot wait you the details about how they make these you the details about how they make these holograms is very interesting. i think these holograms is very interesting. i think the these holograms is very interesting. i think the king and queen of sweden are turning i think the king an
substitute general revenues in the social security trust fund xhsh, which cuts social security. the extension of tax cuts is very bad tax policy and economic policy. it s totally ineffective. if you re extending it for two years under the duress of the situation that conrad explained a few minutes ago, i think the deal is defensible on the whole. professor, as you re wearing your economist hat as opposed to strategic, let s go over a point about the $250,000. that tax was established in 1993. in real dollar terms, $250,000 today working backwards to 93 would you have been $165,000 had that bracket been indexed for inflation as all brackets should be. so the number we re fighting over today, $250,000 is exactly the same number that we fought
families is a very useful thing, and it establishes a principal, which will that you can substitute general revenues in the social security trust fund xhshgs , which cuts social security. the extension of tax cuts is very bad tax policy and economic policy. it s totally ineffective. if you re extending it for two years under the duress of the situation that conrad explained a few minutes ago, i think the deal is defensible on the whole. professor, as you re wearing your economist hat as opposed to strategic, let s go over a point about the $250,000. that tax was established in 1993. in real dollar terms, $250,000 today working backwards to 93 would you have been $165,000 had that bracket been indexed for inflation as all brackets should be.