Given the weight of the evidence, the planning, zoning Economic Planning Commission incurred that a necessity does indeed exist. On a matter of whether this is desirable and compatible with the neighborhood, the Planning Commission again recognized that at t has worked diligently with the planning staff for over two 2 years to develop the most appropriate and less intrusive need to service the gap in coverage. What qualifies is least intrusive in based on the city code and the preferred location under the citys wireless communication guidelines. On all its five locations at t conducted an expensive analysis that conducted the properties in the areas. It conducted the preferred locations because of its zoning, height and location along the signal propagation and addressing the coverage gap by the least intrusive means possible. There are no other locations where at t can feasibly close the gap by a least intrusive means. Having shown there is a gap in the coverage in the area of 431 bal
Definitely want to oppose the approval of this conditional use permit and we are here to support the appeal. I would like to show you the diagram, the subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership that our intention is to build another 34 story. So we will be creating low housing, commercial store for the area, and my concern is this i understand the safety zone to 32 feet. Can you imagine once we build our building, anywhere from 34 stories, i will make it short. So the safety issue, 32 feet were within that. In another issue is the notification process dh most of the Property Owners never got noticed until i just learned about this last week. Thirdly, and if that were reduced the housing, people will not rent m this area which we are decreasing the housing stock. And lastly, i want to say. President david chiu thank you very much. Next speaker. Thank you everyone for me the opportunit
Property owner immediate adjacent to the subject property of 431 balboa street, my property starts as 437 to 439 balboa street. We definitely want to oppose the approval of this conditional use permit and we are here to support the appeal. I would like to show you the diagram, the subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership that our intention is to build another 34 story. So we will be creating low housing, commercial store for the area, and my concern is this i understand the safety zone to 32 feet. Can you imagine once we build our building, anywhere from 34 stories, i will make it short. So the safety issue, 32 feet were within that. In another issue is the notification process dh most of the Property Owners never got noticed until i just learned about this last week. Thirdly, and if that were reduced the housing, people will not rent m this area which we are decreasing the housing
Diagram, the subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership that our intention is to build another 34 story. So we will be creating low housing, commercial store for the area, and my concern is this i understand the safety zone to 32 feet. Can you imagine once we build our building, anywhere from 34 stories, i will make it short. So the safety issue, 32 feet were within that. In another issue is the notification process dh most of the Property Owners never got noticed until i just learned about this last week. Thirdly, and if that were reduced the housing, people will not rent m this area which we are decreasing the housing stock. And lastly, i want to say. President david chiu thank you very much. Next speaker. Thank you everyone for me the opportunity to talk to you. This is the same picture that she show and i want to tell you this is unacceptable Building Code this at t tower. You ca
The Property Owner immediate adjacent to the subject property of 431 balboa street, my property starts as 437 to 439 balboa street. We definitely want to oppose the approval of this conditional use permit and we are here to support the appeal. I would like to show you the diagram, the subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership that our intention is to build another 34 story. So we will be creating low housing, commercial store for the area, and my concern is this i understand the safety zone to 32 feet. Can you imagine once we build our building, anywhere from 34 stories, i will make it short. So the safety issue, 32 feet were within that. In another issue is the notification process dh most of the Property Owners never got noticed until i just learned about this last week. Thirdly, and if that were reduced the housing, people will not rent m this area which we are decreasing the hou