Proposal for the last month a lot going on in the Mayors Office i dont understand i want to sit down with the Mayors Office of housing as they clearly are dealing with the developer i want to marry Community Help facilitate these negotiations we would like to sit down and discuss we have many, many people coming on their way by the way, we only just now heard the continuance it grant and have heard that was grand after our testimony please be prepared at general Public Comment there are a couple hundred people coming i urge you giving us more time beyond june 2nd thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners steve with mary tell on behalf of the project sponsor we dont object to a time longer i understand your calendar were not in opposition of the continuance thank you. Is there any additional Public Comment on the items proposed for continuance. My name is rick hall i support a continuance i believe that a month would be much more appropriate than two weeks i think i certainly agree that
Some point. Commissioners, today on your special calendar item 1 Public Comment on matters to be considered for discussion in closed session. I have no speaker cards. Any Public Comment for item no. 1 . Okay Public Comment is closed. Item 2, consideration consider adoption of motion on whether to assert the attorneyclient privilege regarding matters listed below on your agenda as conference with legal counsel. Commissioner antonini. So moved. Do i hear a second . Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion then to assert attorneyclient privilege, commissioner aintioni. Aye. Commissioner hillis. Aye. Commissioner moore. Aye. Commissioner richards. Aye. And Commission President fong. Aye. That passes unanimously 50 and i will now move to go into closed session. So thank you sfgovtv so item 4 following the closed session the Planning Commission will report on any action during the closed session and consider a motion whether or not to disclose any items. Commissioner moore. A motion t
Richards. Commissioner antonini. Here. Commissioner hillis and commissioner moore . We do expect commissioners johnson and wu to arrive at some point. Commissioners, today on your special calendar item 1 Public Comment on matters to be considered for discussion in closed session. I have no speaker cards. Any Public Comment for item no. 1 . Okay Public Comment is closed. Item 2, consideration consider adoption of motion on whether to assert the attorneyclient privilege regarding matters listed below on your agenda as conference with legal counsel. Commissioner antonini. So moved. Do i hear a second . Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion then to assert attorneyclient privilege, commissioner aintioni. Aye. Commissioner hillis. Aye. Commissioner moore. Aye. Commissioner richards. Aye. And Commission President fong. Aye. That passes unanimously 50 and i will now move to go into closed session. So thank you sfgovtv so item 4 following the closed session the Planning Commission wil
If we over turned the appeal what would your process be. Im sorry to uphold the appeal. Overturn the, sir certification all correct. We would act according to whatever the finding the board of supervisors made as to the specific deficiency the eir and take whatever steps would be necessary to bring the Internal Revenue back through certification and bring the project approvals back for reconsideration okay im going to more often and talk about the Economic Feasibility one of the things weve heard consistently this evening and in many neighborhoods merging and id like for you to discuss the Planning Department roll in reviewing the Economic Feasibility analysis provided by the consultant firm. This is the analysis on the alternatives that are analyzed. Thank you so ill start in responding this Economic Feasibility analysis was prepared by the project sponsor not at the behest of the Planning Department the feasibility was not the basis for decisions about the approvals of project or any
Heard the person believes that of flaltd and because it used the present land value instead of the lands use is there any legal stand. Doorstop mirena burns through the president i think i want to address one point and more directly the pot about the land value the first point i want to address is that the alternatives feasibility studies way part of the Planning Commission Decision Making around approving the project the ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the re